In December, the Reform and Conservative movements held their national convocations, spurring me to examine the state of non-Orthodox Judaism on this continent.
Those denominational gatherings took place in the shadow of some significant and disturbing data on the state of religion in America. The fall-off in membership, the aging of mainline religious supporters and the corresponding rise in religious “nones” represent some of the striking indicators of this religious free-fall among younger Jewish constituencies.
In light of these changes to the American Jewish religious space, a national consultation focusing on the future of liberal Judaism is in order. There needs to be a collective discussion regarding the state and status of our movements: Conservative, Renewal, Reconstructionist and Reform. This is the moment where a new model of collaborative engagement ought to be considered.
We are reminded that “movements,” and for that matter religious institutions in general, were designed to be vehicles for permitting Jews access points to express their Jewishness. As the religious economy expanded over the past 150 years, we as a community benefited from the competitive presence of multiple institutional options.
Today this no longer works to our advantage.
We are the inheritors of a bifurcated system of multiple, even duplicative forms of liberal Jewish offerings that may no longer be structurally and economically viable.
The issues before us must not be seen as merely a structural reinvention of liberal Judaism.
More immediate and compelling will be the messages we seek to convey as a religious tradition in a world that finds itself in profound pain and uncertainty. In this environment, are we able to continue to touch the lives of those who are already aligned with the mission of liberal Judaism and to reach out to those who describe themselves as religious “seekers,” men and women sitting outside of these formal religious networks, who are exploring a range of spiritual ideas and modalities of faith in search of personal meaning? As the liberal voices of North American Jewry, do we have something compelling to share?
An outcome of this model of practice might produce networks of shared experiences, creating different expressions of a revitalized Jewish religious culture.
Why not consider a collective approach that brings together these different voices?
This approach must be understood as a fundamental first step in recasting North American Jewish religious expression and engagement, at a time and in an environment that is not driven by institutional fear but by the belief that our various liberal Jewish expressions carry creative and essential possibilities.
Four principles ought to drive this national discussion:
Intellectual engagement. What are the ideas and resources that we can bring to a new model of contemporary Jewish life?
A new generation of thinkers, practitioners and organizational builders is needed to articulate varying perspectives in the framing of a 21st-century Jewish liberal ideology. Moving beyond the boundaries of “organized” liberal Judaism, what can we extract from the success and experiences of the emergent world of minyanim, independent congregations and start-up institutions that are today a part of the rich landscape of Jewish life?
What forms of intellectual synergy can occur amongst seminaries? Ultimately, how might our congregations benefit from such cross-denominational exchanges, and what will be the impact on the quality of Jewish life for many of our congregants and those beyond its doors?
Economic entrepreneurship. In what ways can our movements creatively collaborate in order to create new economies of operation and, in turn, reach out to serve more Jews who remain disconnected and unaffiliated?
Proposals for religious recalibration are occurring across the landscape of church organizations in America.
Mergers and collaborative arrangements are driving institutional transformation. Already in boardrooms and on the back benches of our synagogues, the conversations about the Jewish future are well along, reflecting such notions as do we really require five or more separate denominational seminaries and umbrella denominational systems?
Political partnerships. In an age of such political dissention and uncertainty, how might our liberal religious communities speak more effectively with one voice? This moment marks an appropriate point to frame a shared progressive Jewish agenda.
Collective responsibility. Our movements have an obligation to serve the thousands of Jews who today simply define themselves as “just Jewish,” to reach out to college students and young adults bereft of Jewish connections, and to Americans in general who remain “unchurched.”
The reality here is that many of those who are seeking community and are interested in exploring spirituality are sitting outside of our tents — in part unaware of what our movements offer or otherwise turned off by the corporate business models of our synagogues, schools and camps.
At a point where everyone can be defined as a Jew by choice, how might we shift our orientation and language from being seen as only appealing to the cultural norms of “insider Jews” — those who share a specific set of communal beliefs and practices — to a more open and competitive religious framework that appeals as well to the “outsider,” be that person a disaffected Jew or a seeker of faith.
Alternative organizing schemes should replace the idea of “membership” with different forms of participation. These new initiatives are likely to attract foundations and funders who find collaborative proposals particularly appealing.
At a point in time when “individualism” is seen as the dominant organizing principle, an initiative that speaks about “shared engagement” would seem to run counter to contemporary cultural norms.
But this is precisely the case behind this proposal — to create a countervailing method and message in order to excite, engage and promote liberal Judaism.
Finding the new commonalities and a shared voice of liberal Jewish thought and practice ought to drive this proposal.
A version of this piece first appeared at eJewishPhilanthropy.com.
I guess my question is….why bother?
You got these jewishish churches that have moved as far away from tradition as possible and seem to be failing. If you’re not interested in rengaging with tradition but going even farther away, turning jewishness into a progressive political movement, why not just drop the Jewish part all togeather?
Why waste money on distinct progressive organizations for the ethnically Jewish? Why can’t these people who have embraced American culture and values rejecting Jewish culture simply get more involved with one of the bazillions of existing groups doing what they seem to advocate?
Why does the group need to say “Jewish”?
To me it smacks a bit of racist elitism. As if “progressive” Jews can’t just join in and play with the goyim they are essentially no different from except for accident of birth.
I think liberal Jews messed up by being accommodating but not proactively seeking new members.
The West is 90% Christian. Christianity is itself a liberal messianic Jewish movement that is 2000 years old and very successful. They put their foot down and said … here are our values now let’s make humanity Christian (or messianic Jewish).
I dropped orthodox Judaism in my 20s… it’s false and evil. My Asian wife converted to reform so I explored it in my 30s. The problem is that it isn’t truly a universal society. It is on paper. But one time i went with her to a reform synguage and this angry white teenager stared at us and said what are you doing here.
Doesn’t matter if he misread the situation by accident and didn’t mean it… There is a systemic issue that Judaism must be open and universal … no one would stare at an Asian person who decided to walk into church.
The same issue arises with Israel and Zionists. Secular atheists who think they are Jews by racial blood … not liberal religion. These underlining racial issues are a problem.
Christianity dealt with this well. It opened the flood gates and said all are welcome. If the orthodox hate us for being loving and open we will hate them back. We will create Christian spaces, Christian countries where our values are embraced.
Sadly liberal Jews haven’t built these spaces. Israel hates you.
If you think your business model makes sense … no reason why random gentiles shouldn’t be told about your good news and convinced to join. Build up your numbers by starting a growth movement … instead of looking for bandaids on how to keep the 3-4 million people from quitting.
Humanity liked Judaism 2000 years ago but saw the flaws of stone throwing orthodox murders during the 2nd temple. They wanted a better Judaism. They got it through Jesus. But it is culturally very different to Judaism… it’s messianic Judaism in name only the look and feel is Roman or pagan. I’m sure they would be open to finally joining the real Judaism if it is liberal which it is …
But you haven’t told them about it