Your Email:

Friend's Email:

Note: (optional)

Subject:

Message: <br /><br /> If you are having trouble reading this email, you may view this article online at: http://www.jweekly.com/31975/full/31975/yes-other-alternatives-have-failed-in-the-past/ <br /><br /> <b>Yes: Other alternatives have failed in the past</b> <br /> Friday, March 23, 2007 | by <p>menachem klein </p> <br /><br /><p>Last week, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert began his weekly Cabinet session saying he is prepared to engage in talks with Arab states based on the Saudi initiative. <br /><br /> He also said Israel is not prepared to engage in talks with a Palestinian government that does not accept the conditions set down by the Quartet, including recognizing Israel’s right to exist, renouncing terror and adhering to former agreements signed with Israel.<br /><br /> Did all the Arab states, primarily Saudi Arabia, accept the Quarter’s conditions? No. Has the Palestinian unity government partially or indirectly accepted the Quartet’s conditions? Yes.<br /><br /> It is not only possible to engage in talks with the Palestinian national unity government, it is mandatory. This Palestinian unity government is signaling that it is prepared to engage in talks. When Hamas elected its Cabinet representatives, it didn’t include its primary leaders; instead it chose intellectuals with whom it would be easier for official Israel to enter dialogue.<br /><br /> Representatives of the Israeli government will have to coordinate common issues pertaining to the daily lives of the population with the ministers of the unity government as well as with Hamas ministers. It would be impossible to ignore Hamas ministers holding agriculture, interior, planning and education portfolios.<br /><br /> Beyond this, talks on a final-status agreement based on the Arab peace plan must be renewed. This is the only game in town. All other alternatives have failed.<br /><br /> Mahmoud Abbas was appointed to negotiate with Israel on this matter. He does not represent Fatah alone, but Palestinian and Arab consensus as well. Hamas is a partner to this consensus. Although it is not doing so openly, the organization got a discount on the ticket to the political train, and has boarded it.<br /><br /> Hamas made an effort to conclude the clauses of the unity government before the Arab summit in Riyadh next week, and Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh will be there alongside Abbas to reaffirm the Arab peace plan.<br /><br /> Those thinking of driving a wedge between Abbas and Hamas are wrong. This was Jerusalem and Washington’s strategic policy, and it failed miserably. The time for dispute between Hamas and Fatah will come during the talks on the details of the final-status agreement.<br /><br /> Not only should the Israeli government engage the Palestinian unity government, the Israeli left should do so as well. The Israeli left should not suffice with talks with Abbas and Hamas alone.<br /><br /> If the Israeli government stands in its way, the left should resume the tactics it used in the 1980s, when the government legislated a bill that prohibited contact with PLO representatives. With the help of several European governments, this obstacle can also be overcome.<br /><br /> <br><b><br /><br /> Menachem Klein</b> is a political science lecturer at Bar Ilan University and a leading Geneva Initiative proponent. Story supplied by YNET News. </p> <p> </p>

Please enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below: