E-mail a Friend

You are sending:
Two Views: Who is to blame for deaths of innocents in Gaza? Hypocritical bleeding hearts unfairly co

Your Email:

Friend's Email:

Note: (optional)

Message: If you are having trouble reading this email, you may view this article online at: http://www.jweekly.com/18196/full/18196/two-views-who-is-to-blame-for-deaths-of-innocents-in-gaza-hypocritical-blee/ Two Views: Who is to blame for deaths of innocents in Gaza? Hypocritical bleeding hearts unfairly co Friday, August 2, 2002 | by Isa Leibler We have every reason to be distressed, angry and disgusted. We are distressed at the accidental deaths of Palestinian civilians, children included, in a military operation against a cruel and evil mass murderer. But Salah Shehada was aware that he topped Israel's hit list and deliberately chose to shield himself among civilians in a densely populated area. The deaths and injuries in Gaza City are his responsibility. We have reason to be angry that Gideon Meir, head of Israel's Foreign Ministry Information Department, rushes to tell CNN and the BBC that the strike was "indefensible" and that Foreign Minister Shimon Peres follows with an outright apology. Apology for what? Given the carnage orchestrated by Shehada and his gang of savages, such apologies—which are tantamount to an acknowledgment of guilt—are a form of masochism. They are even more grotesque in view of our desperate efforts, unlike those of any other nation, to try to minimize civilian casualties, frequently at the cost of the lives of our own soldiers. What are we expected to do when we locate the Palestinian counterpart to Osama bin Laden brazenly organizing new, large-scale terror attacks? Are we to stand by with folded arms until more of our children are blown to pieces? The chorus of hypocritical international bleeding hearts with their usual double standards is beneath contempt. Their condemnations contrast starkly to their muted responses to the suicide bombers and terror attacks targeted against Israeli civilians. None of our detractors questioned why a mass murderer could be permitted to live and work among civilians while actively plotting to kill more Israelis. Instead, we are informed that Sheik Ahmed Yassin, head of an organization whose goal is the destruction of Israel, and who is one of the chief instigators of suicide martyrdom, was allegedly on the point of agreeing to a cease-fire. This report comes from Reuters, which quoted Yassin as saying that Hamas would "consider" a cease-fire if, among other conditions, Israel evacuated the West Bank and released Palestinian prisoners. The timing of this report is transparent as psychological warfare to create the impression that the killing of Shehada was a Sharon conspiracy to kill the negotiations. The gall of tyrants who inhabit the United Nations, who condemn Israel while remaining silent over bestial acts of genocide that take place among their own members, defies belief. Kofi Annan sanctimoniously lectures Israel about international law, fully aware that Shehada brazenly continued recruiting, planning and manufacturing bombs for suicide martyrs right until the moment of his elimination. The shameless Europeans are of course again targeting Israel for war crimes. In this context it is noteworthy that a biased and hostile critic of Israel, Javier Solana, the European representative to the Middle East, crossed all red lines some days ago by holding a personal meeting with none other than Hamas leader Yassin. Paradoxically, Solana was secretary-general of NATO three years ago during the 78-day aerial bombardment of Yugoslavia, which resulted in the deaths of hundreds of innocent civilians. He himself approved the use of cluster bombs on crowded cities and densely populated areas, including the botched effort to assassinate Slobodan Milosevic by bombing his bunker, which was located in a residential neighborhood. Naturally the Third World joins in, particularly the Africans for whom practicing genocide against one another is almost de rigueur. Then there are the Chinese, whose respect for human rights in Tibet and elsewhere is fully on record. And of course the Russians, whose handling of the Chechen insurrection hardly reflects the humanitarian considerations they demand of us. Regrettably, even our friends in America this time felt sufficiently pressured to join the pack. We have been reprimanded for being "excessive" and "heavy-handed." Yet in 1986, after an American soldier was killed by terrorists in a German nightclub, President Reagan ordered an air strike on the residence of Libya's Moammar Khadafy. Khadafy escaped, but 37 civilians, including his daughter, were killed. There were no condemnations by the United Nations or the Europeans on that occasion. A few months ago, referring to casualties incurred among noncombatant family members of Al Qaida, U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told The New York Times that the women and children were in the battle zone "of their own free will, [and] know who they're with and who they're supporting and who they're encouraging and who they're assisting." It would indeed be stretching the imagination somewhat to visualize the United States standing aside and passing up an opportunity to eliminate bin Laden out of concern for the welfare of civilians living with him. We are at war and Israeli civilians are being murdered every day. In such circumstances, the primary obligation of any government must be to defend its citizens. It is high time that we stopped apologizing for civilians killed because they live in proximity to leading terrorists who openly plot to kill Israeli civilians. The Fourth Geneva Convention (Part 3, Article 1, Section 28) states explicitly: "The presence of a protected person may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations." Thus, Arab civilian communities should be clearly warned that they risk their lives if they choose to live in proximity to those trying to kill us. They should understand that the days are over when they could, without risk, indulge in public demonstrations of embracing martyrs, and hold street celebrations every time an Israeli civilian is blown up. Some claim that our actions will only bring about reprisals and intensify the terror. That is not so. The Palestinian terror machine has certainly not exercised restraint these past three months and it is no secret that if Palestinians could kill more of us they would do so irrespective of how many terrorists or civilians we harmed. There are no simple solutions, but the killings could end overnight. Almost all Israelis are appalled at the thought of indefinitely ruling over the Palestinians. The Palestinian Authority has only to announce an end to terror, arrest the killers, and make a genuine effort to enforce law and order. Israel would respond immediately. Negotiations would follow, and the bloodshed would be halted. But as long as the murderers carry on business as usual, with the Palestinian Authority looking on approvingly, Israel has no choice.

Please enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below:

E-mail a Friend

Subscribe to: