Although the deadline has lapsed, the administration still has time to evoke the waiver before certain sanctions called for in the legislation kick in.

With the administration expected to invoke the waiver in coming weeks, a bipartisan group of 10 senators, led by Sens. Joseph Lieberman (D-Conn.) and Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), sternly warned Clinton against taking that course, saying it would be inconsistent with the intent of Congress.

“Non-fulfillment of the law does no good to the U.S.-Israeli relationship or to prospects for Arab-Israeli peace,” the letter states.

“Establishing our Embassy in Jerusalem would constructively demonstrate U.S. support for Israel and, in particular, for Israel’s national rights under international law.”

Clinton, who opposed the embassy legislation from the start, has vowed not to move forward on it until Israeli and Palestinian negotiators resolve the final status of the city.

But some members of Congress think the embassy should have been moved already, arguing that keeping America’s top diplomatic post in Tel Aviv gives the Palestinians false expectations.

Should Clinton invoke the waiver, the lawmakers said, they will seek to force the move by introducing legislation to take away the president’s ability to issue a waiver.

“We believe this is the best way to satisfy the requirements of the law and the legitimate concerns of all parties. And it would serve the cause of peace,” they wrote.

J. covers our community better than any other source and provides news you can't find elsewhere. Support local Jewish journalism and give to J. today. Your donation will help J. survive and thrive!