|
blogs
blog authors
|
Subscribe to Latter-day Shalom
Mormon or Morals: Do Denominations Matter in Today’s Political Scene?9:30 am Thursday, October 13, 2011by christa woodall "Are Mormons Christians?" This question is, unfortunately, not unfamiliar to most members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Despite a Christ-centered theology, certain doctrines that differentiate Latter-day Saints from our Christian brothers and sisters also cause us to, well, not be considered Christians or brothers and sisters by them. Thanks to evangelical minister Rev. Robert Jeffress, that debate has come to the forefront yet again in the race for the 2012 Republican nomination. While introducing Texas Gov. Rick Perry last week, Jeffress said evangelical voters should support a "true Christian" - and that would rule out Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman, Jr., since Jeffress denounced Mormonism as a "cult." Numerous articles and editorials denouncing Jeffress's narrow-minded views have run on major news sites this week, with Latter-day Saints being defended by everyone from the president of the evangelical Fuller Theological Seminary to a Muslim comedian to a Jewish Los Angeles Times columnist. Amid these responses, several writers raised the same question I'd ask: should a candidate's religious belief matter in today's political arena? Aren't candidates' morals, values, and actions better gauges of their hearts than what church - or synagogue or mosque - they attend (or don't)? In looking to weigh in on this issue, I turned to two of my personal favorites - Michael Medved, who hosts a top-rated conservative talk radio show, and his equally brilliant wife, psychologist Dr. Diane Medved. I had the good fortune to intern for The Michael Medved Show in 2003, and it was time spent with the Medveds in their beautiful Seattle-area home that initiated my love of Jewish faith and culture. The Medveds agreed that it is a candidate's track record, not his or her theology, that matters in the election. While theology can sometimes provide a glimpse of one's moral code, the two aren't necessarily synonymous. "I personally believe America is uniquely blessed-at least partially because of the sincere devotion of so many Americans to their faiths," Diane Medved said. "As far as a presidential candidate-you evaluate the candidate and his record; his belief system as it has played out/influenced his performance in office. "We have track records of the candidates to focus on-the person's religious belief is personal, private and irrelevant UNLESS it has interfered with the execution of his duties," she continued. "VALUES are another question-we WANT our representatives to have distinct values we can discuss, evaluate and will inform their actions." As a non-Christian conservative, Michael Medved balked at Jeffress's implication that only an evangelical Christian is a suitable candidate for president. After all, according to Pew Research Center, only 26.3 percent of Americans are evangelical Christians. "If you are going to have a political party that says ‘evangelicals only welcome,' you are doomed not only to minority status but to permanent irrelevancy," Michael Medved said. Regarding the "Are Mormons Christians" question, he continued, "That's up to God to decide, isn't it? Or is this really part of what we should be deciding when we choose someone to vote for as president of the United States?... I care much more about a man's character, and everything I see about Mitt Romney indicates a person of fine character. Isn't that the real point?" I agree. People should be evaluated on the content of their character - not race, not religion, not gender, not socio-economic status. What do they do with their time? Do they show integrity in their actions? Do they support the same causes that matter to me? Is their perspective on the Constitution and the law in line with mine? Then that's who I should support for office. And that works both ways. While I think it's awesome to see two fellow Latter-day Saints in the race, I won't default to supporting either simply because we share the same faith. As for what Mormons represent, Diane Medved summed it up best: "For me, despite having disagreements (of course!) with Mormon belief/theology, I find Mormons (generally) to be upstanding, moral, charitable, straightforward people who sincerely believe their faith. What better neighbors and citizens could anyone possibly want? And their emphasis on family is exactly the counterbalance to hyper-sexed, narcissistic, materialistic media content that our nation absolutely NEEDS to stay sane and even to maintain the course of the founders." Permalink Leave a comment Spread the Word E-mail a friend
Tags:
politics, 2012 election, Jeffress, Romney, Huntsman, Mormon, LDS, cult, Medved, integrity, character, morals, Christian
Related Entries: Forget-Me-Nots and New Beginnings Could a Mormon Make the White House? Finding Joy in Joseph’s Journey This Year in Jerusalem: Passover at BYU’s Jerusalem Center Getting ‘Close Up’ with DeMille’s Ten Commandments CommentsLeave a Comment
In order to post a comment, you must first log in. |




Search
Archives
Subscribe
10/30/2011 at 09:20 PM
Good article. There are two kinds of people in the world, and they come in all races and religions - those with intelligence who are trying to improve the lot of others and then there are the others. The first acknowledge the good in others and try to bring out the best in them. Jesus constantly did this. Included in the others are the self-appointed “official Christians” one of whose missions is to proclaim they are “saved” (reserved for salvation) and thus are appointed to proclaim who un-Christians (literally the damned) are. As we know this group has been with for centuries (remember the centuries of Christian persecutions against the Jews?). A few essential Mormon beliefs that differ from those of today’s official Christians:
Login to reply to this comment or post your ownMormons don’t believe if one does not believe Jesus is the savior he or she will be condemned to an eternal hell. (Gentile addition to the Christian religion)
Mormons don’t believe that to attain a life forever in heaven all that’s required is to believe Jesus (idolatry at its best), thus discounting the essential efforts of obedience to God’s commandments and doing good in this world (which the official Christians condemn as trying to work one’s way to heaven).
Mormon’s don’t believe in God as an abstract essence (paganism), but rather believe He is the Father of us all, as the scriptures proclaim him to be.
Since this is a Jewish site: Mormons don’t believe in excluding the parts of the New Testament that warn the Gentiles who believe in Jesus to not believe they are better than the Jews who don’t believe, because, (in reference to these Jews) “all Israel will all be saved . . . for this is my covenant with them.” (Romans 11:26, 27). Sure could have avoided a lot of persecutions had the official Christians of former times not thrown these scriptures out.