11/18/2014 at 07:50 AM

**zero = i = infinity**

Any Body Can Derive Everything From Geometry @ http://www.abcdefg.co/everything.html

A simple mathematical equation to represent everything including nothing is zero = i = infinity, application of this simple fact will solve all other complex equations. This can be proved as follows. Also click to read ...

0 + 0 = 0

0 - 0 = 0

0 * 0 = 0

0 / 0 = 0

Zero remains constant in any relation to itself. I will use the character “~” to represent infinity and express the following equations. Infinity is similar to zero and remains constant in relation to itself. Click the below image to see the detailed proof.

~ + ~ = ~

~ - ~ = ~

~ * ~ = ~

~ / ~ = ~

The same mathematical truth can be deduced as follows.

0 * 0 = 0 => 0 / 0 = 0

0 * 1 = 0 => 0 / 0 = 1

0 * 2 = 0 => 0 / 0 = 2

0 * i = 0 => 0 / 0 = i

0 * ~ = 0 => 0 / 0 = ~

0 = 1 = 2 =...= i = ~

It seems that mathematics, the universal language, is also pointing to the absolute truth that 0 = 1 = 2 = i = ~, where “i” can be any number from zero to infinity. As all numbers are “absolutely” equal mathematically, so is all creation equal “absolutely”, to think otherwise is the anomaly of duality. As an example, all photons are identical irrespective of their distance from us. Doppler effect is the illusion of duality. If one can see everything at once, one will see the absolute truth of singularity. Absolute truth of singularity is “nothing is indivisible” (0/0). Relative truth of duality is “everything is divisible” (infinity/infinity). Singularity is all-inclusive, to be and not to be at once. Duality is mutually exclusive, to be or not to be at once. Duality is like two sides of a coin, singularity is the coin itself.

I sequences everything using the iSeries which spans the entire numerical spectrum from 0 to infinity and the simple principle underlying it is sum of any two consecutive numbers is the next number in the series. 0 is the base seed and i can be any seed between 0 and infinity. iSeries always yields two sub semi series, each of which has 0 as a base seed and 2i as the first seed. One of the sub series is always defined by the equation

Sn = 2 * Sn-1 + Sigma (i=2 to n) Sn-i where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2 * i

the second sub series is always defined by the equation

Sn = 3 * Sn-1 - Sn-2 where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2 * i

Division of consecutive numbers in each of these subseries always eventually converges on 2.618 which is the Square of 1.618. Union of these series always yields another series which is just a new iSeries of a 2i first seed and can be defined by the universal equation

Sn = Sn-1 + Sn-2 where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2 * i

Division of consecutive numbers in the merged series always eventually converges on 1.618 which is the golden ratio “Phi”.

Fibonacci series is just a subset of the iSeries where the first seed or S1 =1.

Examples of iSeries governed by Sn = Sn-1 + Sn-2 where S0 = 0 and S1 = i = 0.5

-27.5, 17, -10.5, 6.5, -4, 2.5, -1.5, 1, -.5, .5, 0, .5, .5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 6.5, 10.5, 17, 27.5

Sub series governed by Sn = 2 * Sn-1 + Sigma (i=2 to n) Sn-i where S0 = 0 and S1 =1

0, 1, 2, 5, 13, 34 ...

Sub series governed by Sn = 3 * Sn-1 - Sn-2 where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2 * i = 1

0, 1, 3, 8, 21, 55 ...

Merged series governed by Sn = Sn-1 + Sn-2 where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2 * i = 1

0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55 ......

(Fibonacci series is a subset of iSeries, and is a dual series)

*Login to reply to this comment or post your own*

07/30/2014 at 12:10 PM

Retired Control Systems AnalystI SUGGEST THAT YOU ARE THE MOST AVAILABLE SCIENTIST TO WHICH I CAN SUGGEST THAT:

The Cybernetics professed by Norbert Wiener popularized the use of “Block Diagrams” in an applied mathematical context.

Until they are reduced to common practice in the studies of psychological phenomena, fallacies (like the idea of an entitive Self, or active conscious control device) will stymie useable extensions of mathematics into the mental sciences.

My phone number is (503) 297-2472, in the Portland, OR Phonebook (Zip Code 97225-2864)

Signed: O’Neil Poree

Login to reply to this comment or post your own