School tefillin policy for girls widens Orthodox schismby uriel heilman, jta
|Follow j. on||and|
The announcement this week that two Modern Orthodox high schools in New York were allowing girls to lay tefillin is helping expose an increasingly sharp fault line within Orthodoxy.
For decades, it has been difficult to sort out the precise dividing lines among the varieties of Orthodoxy — ultra, haredi, centrist, modern, liberal. The movement has been broad enough to encompass everyone from black hat–wearing rabbis with long beards to young women in jeans and T-shirts.
In recent years, however, a visible divide has been emerging over a single issue: the role of women. It quickly is becoming a line in the sand, pitting the reformers against the traditionalists.
The decisions by SAR High School, located in the Riverdale section of the Bronx, and the Ramaz School in Manhattan, are just the latest developments on this front. Before them came the decision by Rabbi Avi Weiss, an Orthodox rabbi in Riverdale, to ordain female Orthodox clergy. The ordination call came after a number of Orthodox congregations decided that allowing women to lead certain parts of worship — Torah reading, the introductory morning prayers known as Pesukei D’zimra and a few other rituals — did not violate halachah.
It’s difficult to say when it all began. Was the original Bais Yaakov school for girls, opened in Poland in 1917, the first breach, breaking the traditional ban on giving girls a Torah education? The school, which by today’s standards would be considered ultra-Orthodox, was then seen as groundbreaking.
In America, a key milestone came in the latter half of the 20th century when Orthodox schools began offering girls the same Jewish education offered to boys. For many years — and this is still the case in many Orthodox institutions today — only boys were allowed to study Talmud, the central text of Orthodox Judaism. But when Orthodox schools began allowing girls to study Talmud, under the authority of Rabbi Joseph Soloveitchik of the Maimonides School near Boston, it opened the door to a new way of thinking about the role of Orthodox women.
Many of the logical conclusions followed. If an Orthodox girl could study Talmud in high school, why couldn’t she in college? By the early 1980s, Yeshiva University, the flagship institution of modern Orthodoxy, was offering elective Talmud classes at its Stern College for Women, though it wasn’t until 2009 that Stern opened a master’s program in biblical and talmudic interpretation to women.
Ramaz, one of the country’s oldest Modern Orthodox day schools, made an allowance for girls to lay tefillin as far back as the early 1990s, though it did not make a public announcement until this week, saying in an email to the community that it “would be happy to allow any female student who wants to observe the mitzvah of tefillin to do so.”
In 2009, Weiss pushed the envelope even further by ordaining Sara Hurwitz as a rabba, a feminized version of rabbi. The move was condemned immediately, not just by the haredi Orthodox but by leaders of the centrist Orthodox Rabbinical Council of America.
“The ordination of women as rabbis represents a serious and inappropriate breach with our sacred tradition and is beyond the pale of Orthodox Judaism,” said Rabbi Steven Pruzansky of Teaneck, N.J., who was vice president of the RCA.
For a long time, it had been unusual for one sector of American Orthodoxy to condemn another, despite differences in practice and even ideology. But as liberal Orthodox Jews support new roles for women, particularly in the synagogue, it’s looking increasingly like Orthodoxy is undergoing a schism.
The more traditionalist elements of the Orthodox community view the reforms as beyond the pale, a threat to the integrity of their halachic community. This is why Weiss and the yeshivas he has established, including the liberal Orthodox rabbinical school Yeshivat Chovevei Torah, have faced so much Orthodox opposition — from the RCA, which does not recognize Chovevei ordination, to Israel’s Chief Rabbinate, which recently questioned Weiss’ Orthodox credentials.
While the more public battles have been over women being ordained, laying tefillin or reading from the Torah, there are innumerable issues related to women both large and small with which Orthodoxy is grappling. It’s not just about clergy but also women serving as synagogue presidents, making the blessing over bread or wine on Shabbat, or dancing with Torah scrolls on Simchat Torah. While initially considered aberrant, some of these practices gradually have gained acceptance in mainstream Orthodox circles.
Will the changes considered controversial today gradually gain mainstream acceptance, too, or are they fated to remain a fringe Orthodox phenomenon?
In an elastic movement with no central governing authority or membership structure, it’s hard to say. There is, perhaps, one factor that may play an outsize role in determining this: leadership. If the change agents within Orthodoxy become educators, role models and leaders of the next generation of Modern Orthodox Jews, successfully pass on their commitment to both halachah and egalitarianism, and continue to live a life committed to Jewish law, they could transform the face of modern Orthodoxy.
But if they fail, then those who have been arguing all along that these changes have no place in Orthodoxy will see vindication in that failure.
Be the first to comment!