resources
Thursday, January 30, 2014 | return to: news & features, national


Share
 

In State of Union, Obama pledges to veto new Iran sanctions bill

Follow j. on   and 

President Barack Obama in his State of the Union speech pledged to veto any new Iran sanctions.

“Let me be clear: If this Congress sends me a new sanctions bill now that threatens to derail these talks, I will veto it,” he said in his Jan. 28 speech. “For the sake of our national security, we must give diplomacy a chance to succeed.”

The Senate is considering new sanctions, backed by leading pro-Israel groups.

“With our allies and partners, we’re engaged in negotiations to see if we can peacefully achieve a goal we all share: preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon,” Obama said, drawing some of the louder applause of the evening.

In a statement after Obama’s speech, Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) called on the Senate to pass the sanctions bill that he and Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) introduced. The measure now has the backing of 59 senators, not enough to override a veto.

“The American people — Democrats and Republicans alike — overwhelmingly want Iran held accountable during any negotiations,” Kirk said.

Obama’s speech also gave a nod to efforts by Secretary of State John Kerry to broker an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement and pledged support for Israel’s security in the process.

The president pointedly referred to Israel’s status as a Jewish state, a recognition Israel wants from the Palestinians as part of a peace deal.

“American diplomacy is supporting Israelis and Palestinians as they engage in difficult but necessary talks to end the conflict there; to achieve dignity and an independent state for Palestinians; and lasting peace and security for the State of Israel — a Jewish state that knows America will always be at their side,” he said.

More broadly, Obama said, as he launches his final three years in office, he wants to wean America from a “permanent war footing” and reduce U.S. troop presence abroad.

“We must fight the battles that need to be fought, not those that terrorists prefer from us — large-scale deployments that drain our strength and may ultimately feed extremism.” — jta


Comments

Be the first to comment!




Leave a Comment

In order to post a comment, you must first log in.
Are you looking for user registration? Or have you forgotten your password?



Auto-login on future visits