resources
Thursday, January 17, 2013 | return to: views, opinions


Share
 

Is it time to drop Israel’s electoral system? No: Political cycle will shift left as public is rea

by david bernstein

Follow j. on   and 

With Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu poised to win re-election next week, some critics of Israel’s peace and security policies worry out loud that Israel’s political cycle — its pattern of cycling alternately between the political left and right — is stuck on the right.

Anyone who has ever taken a course in economics is familiar with the concept of the business cycle, the observation that our economic fortunes expand and contract in distinct phases. Politics, similarly, has its own natural cycle. One political party becomes strong, thinks it has a lock on the electorate, purges its own ranks of political moderates, enunciates policy positions at odds with mainstream sensibilities and alienates the very middle-of-the-road voters that brought it to power. Republicans and Democrats have been vulnerable to its vicissitudes.

5_bernsteinIsrael, to be sure, is no stranger to the political cycle. Just like Americans, Israelis tend to lean left or right for a period until the ideological camp in power overreaches or external conditions dictate otherwise, sending the pendulum swinging in the opposite direction. Since the onset of the peace process with the Palestinians in the early 1990s, the Israeli public has ousted prime ministers whenever the prime minister has appeared resistant to opportunities for peace or appeared too eager for peace in the face of intransigence on the other side.

In 1992, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir lost the election for being perceived as inflexible in the Madrid peace talks; in 1996, Shimon Peres lost for being too forthcoming in the Oslo process; in 1999, Netanyahu lost for being too hawkish; and in 2001, Ehud Barak lost for being too dovish.

If the political cycle holds true, sooner or later there will be a perceived opening for peace, at which time either the right-leaning government will move to the center (e.g., Menachem Begin’s peace treaty with Egypt) or will be defeated by a left-leaning challenger.

Some critics of current Israeli government policy are troubled that Israelis haven’t punished Netanyahu for a lack of progress in the peace process. They surmise that the growth of the Israeli religious nationalist camp and right-leaning Jews from the former Soviet Union has moved the electorate decidedly to the right. Israelis, they fulminate, may permanently forsake the possibility of a two-state solution.

But in a recent poll of Israeli attitudes toward peace, two-thirds of the respondents said they would support a two-state solution based on the 1967 borders, with land swaps and a demilitarized Palestinian state. Even a majority of Likud voters supported such a deal.

The issue, then, is not that Israeli attitudes have hardened against making painful compromises for peace; quite the contrary. It’s that most Israelis don’t believe that peace is a realistic option at the moment.

It’s not hard to see why. Given the massive unrest sweeping through the Arab world and the ascendance of the Muslim Brotherhood, many wonder how a fledgling Palestinian state could stave off such radical forces or survive a Hamas onslaught.

The results of Israel’s 2005 withdrawal from Gaza, Hamas’ subsequent takeover and the unremitting rocket fire aimed at Israeli population centers do not inspire confidence in a peace deal with the West Bank.

“There will be those who say, ‘If you didn’t like the book [in Gaza], why would you see the movie [in the West Bank]?’” observed Middle East analyst David Makovsky.

Do critics of Israeli policy expect that no matter what the Arab world dishes out, Israelis will continue to elect governments with a predilection for making comprehensive peace offers? Do they expect Israel to be on a permanent peace footing?

If so, then they want Israel to be a country not made up of diverse people with diverse attitudes subject to political swings, but of people just like them who will make concessions at any time and at all costs. They want Israel to be a country like no other. That cannot exist, because all democratic polities are, in their own way, beholden to the inexorable logic of the political cycle.


David Bernstein is the executive director of the David Project.


Comments

Posted by rocky
01/20/2013  at  09:08 AM
Weimar Repeated?

Could the author please explain why Israel adopted the failed Weimar system of proportional representation? Of the 34 parties running for Knesset seats, about 15 are expected to have at least one seat in the new Knesset. It will mean once again that the religious parties will hold the balance of power and will once again extract favors in exchange for their votes. Once again, a coalition government will be too timid to deal with the country’s growing number of draft dodgers (primarily Haredi) and its growing Haredi welfare burden. How long does the author think that Israel can survive as a primarily Jewish state given current demographic trends? I wonder how many of the hundreds of thousands of protestors in Tel Aviv in the summer of 2011 have already left the country for better opportunities abroad?

Login to reply to this comment or post your own



Leave a Comment

In order to post a comment, you must first log in.
Are you looking for user registration? Or have you forgotten your password?



Auto-login on future visits