Thursday, September 27, 2012 | return to: views, opinions


Protesting against Israel — valid or anti-Semitic?: As BDS season opens at Cal, anti-Semitism begi

by ronald hendel

Follow j. on   and 

It’s that time of year. The fall semester has begun, the leaves are turning orange and scarlet in Berkeley, and the radical leftist student groups on campus have started their annual push for the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign against Israel.

vhendel_with_nameAs many times as this movement is defeated on campus, it always comes back, like a zombie in a bad movie. The big news is that the University of California Student Association has come out in favor of BDS (see story, 3). This organization, which on its website claims to be “the official voice” of U.C. students, has a mandate of “increasing the accessibility, affordability and quality of the U.C. system.” So, naturally, supporting the BDS movement advances its core mission.

The board of the U.C. Student Association, which represents all 10 campuses, passed its BDS resolution at its Sept. 15 board meeting in Berkeley. The resolution has two main themes. The first is a denunciation of California Assembly House Resolution 35, which advises the U.C. campuses to regulate anti-Semitic speech and actions on campus. The second theme is an endorsement of the BDS campaign. How does a response to the problem of anti-Semitism turn into an endorsement of BDS?

Here’s how it goes. The resolution objects to HR 35 because the bill associates the BDS campaign with anti-Semitic events and speech on U.C. campuses. But the resolution avers that this cannot be true, because there is “campus unity” in support of “actions critiquing and responding to Israeli policies.” So, if all the students at U.C. campuses support BDS, then this campaign can hardly be associated with inciting anti-Semitic events. But this is a lunatic claim. Every BDS resolution at a U.C. campus has been defeated. There is considerable (majority) opposition to the BDS movement on campus and to the atmosphere of hate and intolerance that it engenders. Even more bizarre is the footnote that provides evidence for this claim. The footnote is a link to an advertisement for Palestinian Awareness Week at U.C. Santa Cruz, and an odd article from the campus newspaper, “Palestinian Awareness Week Disrupted: Student interrupts poetry reading at Cultural Solidarity Night.” (You can’t make this stuff up!) Two other footnotes in the resolution (out of a total of seven) are links to letters and articles written or co-signed by the radical organization Students for Justice in Palestine.

Who wrote this resolution? Who was feeding the board their talking points? Well, if the footnotes are any indication, it was ghostwritten by Students for Justice in Palestine. After the resolution was announced, a member of the SJP involved in the deliberations sent an email to other members stating: “there was not much word spread about this in the last few days that led up to the meeting … in order to prevent unwanted lobbying/intimidation tactics.” This is code that means no Jewish student groups were consulted or involved in the resolution.

The conclusion “encourages all institutions of higher learning to cleanse their investment portfolios of unethical investments in companies implicated in or profiting from violations of international human rights law, without making special exemptions for any country.” Of course, the only country mentioned in the resolution is Israel. This is pure BDS boilerplate.

Let me summarize.  The board of the U.C. Student Association approved a resolution written by the radical group Students for Justice in Palestine about how to respond to the issue of anti-Semitism on campus.  The resulting resolution is twofold: a rejection of the allegation that there is a problem, and an endorsement of the BDS campaign. The board invited no Jewish groups, and no moderate political groups, to advise them about the issue of anti-Semitism on campus, or what it means to be a Jewish student at U.C. The director of the U.C. Student Association informs me: “Normally we do actively seek out other students to come and present a rebuttal argument because we may not truly know the point that the students are attempting to make.”  No such invitations were issued in this case.

These decisions, it seems to me, are profoundly stupid, chutzpadik and, hmm — what’s another appropriate adjective? Oh yes, anti-Semitic. Well, anyway, it’s an exciting start to the season.

Ronald Hendel is the Norma and Sam Dabby Professor of Hebrew Bible and Jewish Studies at U.C. Berkeley.


Posted by RHassner
09/28/2012  at  09:38 PM
An excellent post, Ron.

An excellent post, Ron.  You might have added that the vote was intentionally held on Shabbat and on the day before Rosh Hashanah, to minimize Jewish presence.  Now imagine a hypothetical conversation about anti-Syria measures on campus (not that such a thing would ever happen) as anti-Muslim measures.  How might that conversation change if a vote to de-link anti-Syrianism from anti-Islamism were orchestrated to take place on Id al Adha?  Chutzpah doesn’t begin to describe it.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Michael Harris
10/03/2012  at  01:30 PM
In case there was any doubt about anti-Semitism

The Free Gaza Movement, which organizes the Hamas support flotillas, published a tweet on their official account which stated “Zionists operated the concentration camps and helped murder millions of innocent Jews”, and linked to a video by a Holocaust denier from the UK, Eustace Mullins.
The story was broken by Avi Mayer:
Interestingly enough, the silence from all of the endorsers of the Free Gaza Movement (which locally includes Jewish Voice for Peace and Bay Area Women in Black) has been deafening.  Is JVP perhaps waiting for permission from extremists such as Ali Abunimah before they can denounce this blatant anti-Semitism?  That’s who had to give them permission to denounce the Jew-hater Gilad Atzmon. 
No, not all of the anti-Israel activists are as hard-core anti-Semitic as the Free Gaza Movement.  But don’t think for a moment that there isn’t a black hole of anti-Semitism at its heart.  And the cowardice of those who endorse the FGM is fully revealed.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own

Leave a Comment

In order to post a comment, you must first log in.
Are you looking for user registration? Or have you forgotten your password?

Auto-login on future visits