09/14/2012 at 09:38 AM
Regardless of how one feels about the supposedly zealous manner in which the “G-word” is bandied about, that’s no excuse for parading fiction as if it were fact.
The statement that “Every president adds ‘So help me God’ on taking the oath of office, and each has mentioned God in his inaugural address” is false on two counts.
First, the historical record shows that most presidents, starting with George Washington, are not known to have added a non-biblical, extra-constitutional codicil to the presidential oath as prescribed by the United States Constitution. It is true, however, that we have to wait for the early part of the twentieth century before an elected president is reliably known to have acted without constitutional authority when committing to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” (Please remember, the Constitution doesn’t use the G-word at all.) Furthermore, it’s only since FDR’s 1933 inaugural ceremony that every modern president has followed suit. (It’s only on Sunday, January 20, 1957, on the eve of President Eisenhower’s inauguration, that this fiction about “every president” first appeared.)
Second, there is a striking exception to presidents who have referred to the Almighty in their inaugural address. That notable exception is George Washington’s second inaugural address. Here it is in its entirety:
“Fellow Citizens:
I AM again called upon by the voice of my country to execute the functions of its Chief Magistrate. When the occasion proper for it shall arrive, I shall endeavor to express the high sense I entertain of this distinguished honor, and of the confidence which has been reposed in me by the people of united America. 1
Previous to the execution of any official act of the President the Constitution requires an oath of office. This oath I am now about to take, and in your presence: That if it shall be found during my administration of the Government I have in any instance violated willingly or knowingly the injunctions thereof, I may (besides incurring constitutional punishment) be subject to the upbraidings of all who are now witnesses of the present solemn ceremony.”
In Washington’s case, you should be aware, he was extraordinarily circumspect as to mentioning the “G-word” when speaking of religious matters. Now that’s something worth tweeting about!
Login to reply to this comment or post your own





What really startled me, however, was the surge of responses I received from people who were glad to see God go unnamed in the Democratic platform. They didn’t say they don’t believe in God, though that may be true. Rather, they claimed that in the United States, politics and religion should have nothing to do with each other. Tweet after tweet seemed to take it for granted that references to God don’t belong in American public life:
All
09/13/2012 at 03:49 PM
separation of Church and State? Why should anything that smacks of ANYONE’S religious beliefs appear at the convention of one of our two primary political parties?
Login to reply to this comment or post your own