Thursday, August 2, 2012 | return to: news & features, international


In Israel, Romney avoids Palestinians — publicly, at least

by ben sales, jta

Follow j. on   and 

Mitt Romney’s policy speech in Israel July 29 covered plenty of bases: The presumptive Republican presidential candidate spoke about the status of Jerusalem, the threat of a nuclear Iran, the “tumult” of the Arab Spring and the “enduring shared values” that bedrock the U.S.-Israel relationship.

But there was one topic that gained little attention: Israel’s conflict with the Palestinians. The word “Palestinian” did not appear once in the public speech.

Aside from a short meeting with Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, the status of the Palestinians was nearly absent from Romney’s swing through Israel on July 29-30. He did not meet with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, who has led the most recent rounds of Israeli-Palestinian talks, and he mentioned support for a two-state solution only briefly at the end of a statement with Israeli President Shimon Peres.

Mitt Romney visits the Western Wall in Jerusalem on Tisha B’Av, July 29.   photo/courtesy of
Mitt Romney visits the Western Wall in Jerusalem on Tisha B’Av, July 29. photo/courtesy of
Romney’s campaign also canceled a meeting with Labor Party leader Shelly Yachimovich a few hours in advance. Labor traditionally has been more supportive of negotiations with the Palestinians than the ruling Likud Party.

While Romney mostly kept away from the Palestinian issue in public, it did come up in private — and then blew up in public.

During his July 29 speech at a closed fundraiser, in which he was seated next to billionaire casino owner Sheldon Adelson, Romney reportedly attributed Israel’s economic success to cultural differences between Israelis and Palestinians, crediting “the power of at least culture and a few other things,” including a strong pro-business climate, the travails of overcoming Jewish history’s blows and the “hand of providence.”

Saeb Erekat, a senior aide to Abbas, pounced on the comments.

“It is a racist statement, and this man doesn’t realize that the Palestinian economy cannot reach its potential because there is an Israeli occupation,” he said, according to the Associated Press. Romney “lacks information, knowledge, vision and understanding of this region and its people,” Erekat added. ‘‘He also lacks knowledge about the Israelis themselves. I have not heard any Israeli official speak about cultural superiority.’’

Erekat also said it was “absolutely unacceptable” that Romney called Jerusalem “the capital of Israel.”

During the primary campaign, Romney joined his fellow GOP candidates in slamming the Obama administration’s public criticism of Israeli settlement policy. But he also criticized former presidential candidate Newt Gingrich’s assertion last year that the Palestinians were an “invented” people, suggesting that such talk was a “mistake” and “incendiary.”

President Barack Obama’s Israel policy during his first two years focused on an aggressive push for Israeli-Palestinian talks, along with a demand that Israel freeze all settlement construction in the West Bank. Subsequent negotiations stalled, and the demand for a freeze created significant tension between Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

“The Palestinians were the main issue” for Obama, said Shmuel Sandler, a researcher at Israel’s Begin-Sadat Center. Romney, by contrast, “put the emphasis on Iran and Jerusalem. This was a way of differentiating himself from Obama.”

Sandler said that Romney, if elected, would follow four consecutive presidents who led major drives for Israeli-Palestinian peace.

Shlomo Brom, a senior research associate at the Israeli Institute for National Security Studies, suggested that despite Romney’s near silence on the Palestinians, he may still follow suit if elected.

“The way people act in elections doesn’t predict what will be afterward,” Brom said. “Romney doesn’t have a constituency in the United States that’s interested in the subject of the Palestinians.”

But with peace negotiations moribund for nearly two years, Brom said that Romney’s focus on the threat of a nuclear Iran and the Arab Spring accords with what many Israelis see as the two most important issues facing the region.

Romney called denying Iran nuclear weapons “our highest national security priority,” and his adviser, Dan Senor, said that a Romney administration would back a unilateral Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Romney also called on Egypt’s new president, Mohamed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood, to keep Egypt’s peace treaty with Israel and admonished Syrian President Bashar Assad, whom he called “no friend to Israel and no friend to America,” for killing his own citizens.

Sandler added that most Israelis at this point “realize that there’s not going to be a peace soon.” He attributed that realization to fundamental gaps between Israel and the Palestinian Authority on the status of Palestinian refugees, the fate of Israeli settlement blocs close to the West Bank border and disagreement on whether eastern Jerusalem will be under Israeli or Palestinian sovereignty.


Posted by Dan Spitzer
08/02/2012  at  05:02 PM
To Ignore the Palestinians Reflects Romney's Ineptitude with...

the practice of statecraft. Even Netanyahu has acknowledged that the only way peace will ever come to Israel ultimately be a two state solution.

For Romney to choose to overlook one of the two parties in what will eventually need to be discussions to the formation of a Palestinian state demonstrates that he places political opportunism over requisite political negotiations.

Of course, the irony is that Romney will fail to sway many Jews to vote for him as the most recent polls show an overwhelming Jewish support for Obama…

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Frank
08/04/2012  at  04:58 AM
Obama dangerous to Israel

Obama is the most anti-Israel president in history.  If he is re-elected, and Israel has not bombed Iran’s nuclear weapons facilities, Obama will have all the “flexibility” he needs to obstruct Israel from preventing a second Holocaust.

Every American Jew and friend of Israel should watch this video before the election:

Democrat congressmen, senators, and other leaders have publicly recognized Obama’s dangerous enmity towards Israel.  Romney is a true friend to Israel and the Jewish people, who will reverse Obama’s shameful and dangerous reversal of American foreign policy toward Israel.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Dan Spitzer
08/05/2012  at  10:02 AM
Frank, Didn't You Read Barak's Statement Yesterday?

The Israeli Defense Minister said unequivocally that the Obama Administration had provided greater assistance to safeguarding Israel than any previous American presidency.

Stop with your utter BS propaganda Frank. Unless, that is, you wish to continue to make yourself a laughingstock on this site…

Login to reply to this comment or post your own

Leave a Comment

In order to post a comment, you must first log in.
Are you looking for user registration? Or have you forgotten your password?

Auto-login on future visits