Thursday, September 1, 2011 | return to: views, opinions


Should Israel support Palestinian statehood in U.N. vote? — Yes

by Rachel Biale

Follow j. on   and 

Yes: Two-state promise of 1947 should be fulfilled

My parents were the last to squeeze into Reuven’s room on Nov. 29, 1947. Anyone else who wanted to hear the broadcast on his radio, one of only two on the kibbutz, would have to do so through the open door. Everyone had to stand so as to squeeze themselves into the smallest possible space.  Like most people, my mother and father had brought a small notebook and pencil, prepared with a column for “yes” and another for “no,” to tally the vote on U.N. Resolution 181: the vote to end the British Mandate in Palestine and create two states in its place.

rachel biale
rachel biale

My mother still remembers the slightly bloody taste in her mouth as she bit her lower lip in order to hold back her tears. Then she furtively looked at other people’s faces and saw theirs. She let go just when, a bit after 11 p.m., the final tally was announced: 33 in favor, 13 against, 10 abstentions.  Now everyone cried, and cheered: The United Nations had just voted to recognize Israel as a new state. And Palestine.

But following the 1948 war, our “War of Independence” and the Palestinians’ “Nakba” (marking it or teaching about it in publicly sponsored events and schools is now outlawed in Israel!), Israel and, even more so, its Arab neighbors, aborted the creation of Palestine and abandoned the Palestinian people.  It has been nearly 64 years. How much longer can we deny that Palestinians, too, regardless of how belligerent, intransigent and diplomatically self-destructive they have been, deserve a state of their own?

Instead of fighting the upcoming vote in the United Nations, Israel should announce its support for finally implementing the second half of “The Partition Plan” — Palestine. Ethical and historical arguments should suffice. But there is an additional vital strategic one as well. By declaring in advance its affirmative vote, Israel will pre-emptively empty the rhetorical arsenals of its opponents and enemies (and there are plenty!). 

Israel should declare that, indeed, it favors the creation of a Palestinian state and is ready to meet face to face, nation to nation, with a democratically elected, socially responsible, ethically guided and politically realistic Palestinian government to negotiate all the points of disagreement. 

Israelis, with broad support from Jews in the United States and around the world, already accepted a Palestinian state in 1947. It was affirmed in the Oslo agreement and even by Benjamin Netanyahu. In a speech at Bar Ilan on June 14, 2009 (admittedly by far his most conciliatory statement), he stated Israel would accept a demilitarized Palestinian state (other preconditions having been met). Ariel Sharon accepted it, de facto, by stating that the occupation (his exact words: “ha-kibush”) cannot be sustained indefinitely. 

An Israeli vote for a Palestinian state might bring Israel and the Palestinians back to productive negotiations. It might not. If it does not, we will be back exactly where we are now. But we will be there without the damage that focusing on defeating the U.N. resolution will bring, making Israel, yet again, appear intransigent and combative, and straining its relationship with the United States nearly to the breaking point.

Less than six months after the U.N. vote, on May 14 — the day Resolution 181 set as the end of the British Mandate — David Ben-Gurion and his newly formed government announced the creation of the State of Israel. My parents were packed into Reuven’s room again, listening to Ben-Gurion read aloud Israel’s Declaration of Independence. I am still moved when I read it today. But I can’t help but think of it in the following, minimally altered way (only underlined words have been changed): 

“Eretz Yisrael was the birthplace of the Palestinian people. Here their spiritual, religious and political identity was shaped … After being forcibly exiled from their land, the people kept faith with it throughout their Dispersion and never ceased to pray and hope for their return to it and for the restoration in it of their political freedom. Impelled by this historic and traditional attachment, Palestinians strove in every successive generation to re-establish themselves in their ancient homeland …  aspiring towards independent nationhood.”

The vote in the United Nations is not without problems, but its arrival cannot be fended off. Instead of fighting it, Israel should seize it as an opportunity to position itself squarely on the side of intellectual honesty, fairness and diplomatic advantage. We might even suggest to the Palestinians that they request rescheduling the vote for Nov. 29, 2011.


Rachel Biale lives in Berkeley. She worked as a professional in the Bay Area Jewish community for more than 20 years.


Posted by Dan Spitzer
09/01/2011  at  06:00 PM
Ms. Biale is Naive

Israel should not recognize a Palestinian state until the political leaders of said state—today Fatah and Hamas-recognize the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state.

Indeed, right in this issue of J is a quote from so-called moderate Abbas that he would NEVER recognize Israel as a Jewish state. Moreover, both the Fatah and Hamas covenants continue to call for the liquidation of Jews in Israel.

When Palestinian political leadership in essence will neither recognize Israel as a Jewish state and won’t alter their own charters which call for the elimination of Israeli Jews, Israel understandably has little reason to advocate a Palestinian state still dedicated to the destruction of its Jewish neighbors…

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by chaimleib
09/02/2011  at  05:09 PM

The PLO charter has certainly been altered and recognizes the state of Israel.

It is up to Israel to define itself, not the Palestinians. Here’s how Israel defines itself in Israel’s Declaration of Independence (1948), “THE STATE OF ISRAEL will be open for Jewish immigration and for the ingathering of the Exiles; it will foster the development of the country for the benefit of all its inhabitants; it will be based on freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel; it will ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or sex; it will guarantee freedom of religion, conscience, language, education and culture; it will safeguard the Holy Places of all religions; and it will be faithful to the principles of the Charter of the United Nations.”

May it be G-d’s will that Israel actually be as Israel defines itself, bim heyra v’ameynu, speedily and in our time.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Dan Spitzer
09/02/2011  at  07:10 PM
chaimleilb, How has Israel not Acted in Line with Its Declaration of Independence?

Give me one example of how israel has departed from it.

On the other hand, the PLO/Fatah leader, so-called moderate Abbas, just Thursday said he would NEVER recognize Israel as a Jewish state. In this way, he is in line with PLO’s original charter denying Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state. And, of course, Hamas-democratically elected as the political leader of the Palestinian people-has a charter which calls for the destruction of Israeli Jews.

So while Israel is a true democracy where Jew and Arab live under the same laws, the Palestinians still can’t abide by a Jewish homeland…

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by rfaelmoshe
09/07/2011  at  03:36 PM
The ball is in their court

The proverbial “ball” has always been in the Arab’s court,rather than Israel’s.  Although the author recalls the 1947 U.N. vote re: Partition, she doesn’t mention the 1937 Peel Commission Plan re: Partition nor the 1923 illegal severance of 2/3 of the British Mandate of Palestine and transformation into the modern state of “Jordan.”  The UN didn’t “create” the state of Israel,  but rather recognized the reality of Israel’s hard won independence. Similarly, the UN cannot “create” history’s first “Arab State of Palestine”  , the “Palestinians” have to do that.  At present, the “Palestinians” have yet to honor a single agreement ever signed on their behalf. The budget proposed for the"Palestinian State” presumes massive foreign charity for eternity. The institutions of a stable, peaceful, democratic, national entity have yet to be established.  A UN resolution regarding “Palestinian statehood” would be a guarantee of future war.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Sam Liron
09/10/2011  at  04:19 PM
misguided soul

Rachel, I did not serve and fought in 1967 war for you be telling Israel about the memories of your dear mother, I lived there and remember that day vividly. Yet it is upsetting to hear people like you who lives out of harm’s way in comfortable Berkeley and to preach Israel about your elevated sense of morality and demanding that Israel lived up to your mirage….
Grow up, it is for the Israelis to determine their objectives and elect their government and for you to support the only Jewish state in the world that one day may become your safe haven….

Login to reply to this comment or post your own

Leave a Comment

In order to post a comment, you must first log in.
Are you looking for user registration? Or have you forgotten your password?

Auto-login on future visits