resources
Thursday, July 28, 2011 | return to: views, editorial


Share
 

Scary thought: Attack may spark more Israel hatred in Norway

Follow j. on   and 

The carnage in Norway rightly dominated the week’s news, with Anders Behring Breivik accused of a monstrous murder spree that defies comprehension.

We extend our deepest condolences to the families of the victims and to all the Norwegian people.

With the Oslo bombing and shootings on Utoya Island, Breivik is suspected of slaughtering 68 innocent people, most of them teenagers attending a retreat run by the ruling Labor Party. This would appear to be the handiwork of a meticulous madman.

Unfortunately, the bloody crime has taken on disturbing dimensions beyond the body count.

Breivik’s extreme nationalistic beliefs are documented in a 1,500-page manifesto. Among other things, those beliefs seem to incorporate a loathing of Islam and admiration for Israel.

In light of this, Jewish communities in Norway and around the world may need to prepare for potential blowback.

It is unfortunate that this alleged killer linked Islamophobia with Israel. Anti-Israel and anti-Jewish sentiment has long run strong in Norway, somewhat mirroring the consistent and growing right-wing extremism seen in many European nations.

Moreover, the day before the killings, the teens on Utoya Island had gathered for a workshop on promoting BDS (boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel).

Add it all up and it is possible that some people will blur the lines between Breivik’s ravings and a principled pro-Israel stand.

It should be crystal clear that the Israel in Breivik’s diseased mind, which he sees as some sort of bulwark against multiculturalism, is not the real Israel. Multicultural Israel boasts a sizeable Muslim population, which enjoys equal rights of citizenship alongside Jews.

That’s not to suggest Israel faces no internal problems. Obviously, in as diverse a society as Israel, tensions do exist, especially when factoring in the ongoing conflict with the Palestinians and neighboring Arab countries.

Yet within Israel, there is no epic clash of civilizations — and certainly not the kind of anti-Arab uprising Breivik hoped to start. We are confident most Israelis would strongly reject Breivik’s twisted views and his avowed reverence for Israel.

This truth won’t stop the demonizers. Throughout Norwegian society, anti-Israel views have long held sway. With anti-Semitic acts and statements commonplace in that country, some Norwegian Jews have expressed fears of a backlash.

We hope that won’t happen, but no matter what, we can say categorically that despite his repugnant claims, Breivik and his ilk are no friends of Israel or the Jewish people.


Comments

Posted by fuzzywzhe
07/28/2011  at  10:56 AM
Israel linked with "Islamophobia"? NO!!!

Israel is a country in which an Arab family had to sue to the Israeli high court to get the right to buy land in Katzir, which was a Jewish only town.

Israel is a country in which Tzipi Livni expressed support in expelling a portion of the Arab population during the Palestinian peace talks, and she’s considered “far left” in Israel.

This is nation in which “Marriage to an Arab is national treason”, that’s what ynet news reported that over 1/2 of the Israeli population believes, and Jewish people constitute 80% of the population, it at least 70% of the Jewish people agreeing.

This is a nation that BEGAN the Palestinian conflict by demanding partition, which is nothing more than a fancy word for segregation from the native Arab population of the land, and has carried on a 60+ year civil war during the entire time.

Golly gee whiz, why would Israel be linked to “Islamophobia”?

Israel is a nation that’s fostered fear of Islam for over a 1/2 century.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by RfaelM
07/28/2011  at  04:46 PM
Once again, a Bay Area person gets it backwards

Once again, a Bay Area person gets it backwards.  Its beyond explanation, but there are many folks in the Bay Area that prefer to believe the highly refined mythology popularly called the “Palestinian narrative” rather than actual history. Actually the real partition was in 1923 when the British handed 2/3 of the Mandate of Palestine to the Hashemite family from Mecca, barring it to Jews. Partition was proposed as a solution to the political impasse,in the spirit of compromise and accommodation. The Arab side (the phrase “Palestinian” was not invented until 1964) not only rejected partition,they rejected any political rights for Jews at all, insisting on a war of extermination in 1948. Any area where thee was an Arab victory, the Jews were massacred and ethnically cleansed. Similarly, the Jews of Hebron, Tsvat, Silwan etc were ethnically cleansed in the “Arab Riots.“Perhaps “Islamaphobia” means “fear of Muslim violence” and for good ,historic reason.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by craven_maven
07/29/2011  at  08:20 PM
Ridiculous and Duplicitous Editorial

This editorial is dumb, just plain dumb, and more than a little dishonest and manipulative.

Norway’s antipathy towards Israel is due to its leftist-liberal leanings, which are exactly similar to the Bay Area’s, and has nothing to do with the murderer Breivik, a right-wing loon. (Breivik hates Muslims, so he kills Norwegian teenagers, not Muslims ... go figure.)

This editorial is just more left-wing nonsense meant to arouse fear and loathing of conservatives, who, ironically, are Israel’s staunchest friends.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by lucid
07/29/2011  at  10:34 PM
nut case. end of story

He was a nut case and his crime mass murder.

No need for hand wringing.

If you feel bad, mourn for the parents who lost their children

end of story

Login to reply to this comment or post your own



Leave a Comment

In order to post a comment, you must first log in.
Are you looking for user registration? Or have you forgotten your password?



Auto-login on future visits