resources
Thursday, April 28, 2011 | return to: views, editorial


Share
 

Editorial: Ban on circumcision is way over the line

Follow j. on   and 

Looks like they made it.

Activists seeking to ban circumcision in San Francisco have apparently collected more than enough signatures to get their measure on the fall ballot. Once the Department of Elections certifies the petitions, most likely it’s on to the Nov. 8 polls.

Jews and all people who believe in parental rights, religious freedom and the First Amendment must now unite to crush this odious initiative.

When word of the ballot measure first broke a few months ago, San Francisco once again became a laughingstock. Even Jon Stewart took a few potshots. But when forces line up to take away basic rights from citizens, it is no laughing matter.

Let us not discount the possibility that this thing could actually pass. Imagine if that happens: Jewish parents who undertake the ancient rite of brit milah in San Francisco would be subject to fines. Mohels could be sent to prison.

Odds are it won’t ever get that far. We believe voters, even in progressive San Francisco, will see this measure as an obscene attempt at government overreach, a slam against religious freedom and, yes, arguably anti-Semitic.

Were it to pass, we would expect an immediate court fight, injunctions and ultimately a definitive ruling that any law that deprives parents of the right to circumcise their sons is unconstitutional.

Parents, including Jewish parents, are perfectly within their rights to reject circumcision for their children. Even though the evidence of long-term health benefits of circumcision is overwhelming, we have no problem with anti-circumcision activists making their case. It’s part of the marketplace of ideas that defines American-styled freedom of expression.

Once activists cross over the line to some sort of dictatorial, government mandate, however, they have left that marketplace and entered into utterly unacceptable, un-American territory.

Recently in New Zealand and parts of Europe, efforts were launched, unsuccessfully, to ban kosher slaughter. Now, in our own backyard, we see this effort to turn parents, doctors and mohels into criminals. Proponents vehemently deny their actions are anti-Semitic, but we cannot help but suspect a deeper venality afoot when others attempt to erode religious freedoms.

We will no doubt follow this story all the way through to the November election. Between now and then, we are certain Jewish groups will help establish a coalition of the interfaith, legal and medical communities to fight the ban.


Comments

Posted by LiamCornell
04/28/2011  at  03:56 PM
Being Modern

I think it’s fair and modern to let children decide for themselves. The penis is a very important private part and people should decide for themselves.  what gets cut off there. Not to mention that genital cutting is still genital cutting, I don’t care what fancy word you have for it. Finally, the health benefits for the procedure are not fully explained or proven, which is why American Pediatric Associations do not recomend it.  BTW, This is a very important issue. Respect to human beings starts at day 1.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by LiamCornell
04/28/2011  at  03:57 PM
Women, what if it was your vagina at stake?

Sounds a little off, but seriously - what’s the worst that will happen if you let a boy keep his penis as nature intended it. Most of europe is uncircumcised, how come there is no AIDS epidemic there - in fact, there is more AIDS in the US. I think this is Jewish tribalism/ancientism (from a dual Israeli-American citizen, former Jew)

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by LiamCornell
04/28/2011  at  04:03 PM
Genital Cutting = Genital Cutting

Think about it - it’s still genital cutting - without expressed consent from the victim. Men are being repressed sexually and won’t talk about it because in truth, their penises are too small and they don’t enjoy sex…ladies, testify!

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by LiamCornell
04/28/2011  at  04:05 PM
Anti-Semitism/Children's Rights

The Jews can be anti-semites too. Aren’t arabs semites? My parents were Israeli and I had never heard so much hatred in my life until they talked about Arabs - or Orthodox Jews. Also, why is anti-semitic to respect children’s rights. NOT EVERYTHING IS ABOUT JEWS, other people mutilate genitals too.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by LiamCornell
04/28/2011  at  04:06 PM
Email me for a debate

If anyone would like to email me with their thoughts, feel free, .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by tommy124
04/28/2011  at  04:17 PM
Did anyone think that Jon

Did anyone think that Jon Stewart was going to be impartial on the subject?  Where was everybody, when female circumcision was banned in 1997?  If circumcision is really a religious right, where were you to defend Muslim religious freedom then?
Are the Russian Jews any less Jewish, because they don’t circumcise?  God bless the Bris Shalom.  It’s a much more humane way to bring a child into the world.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by tommy124
04/28/2011  at  04:22 PM
is circumcision, or child genital cutting over the line?

Did anyone think that Jon Stewart was going to be impartial on the subject?  Where was everybody, when female circumcision was banned in 1997?  If circumcision is really a religious right, where were you to defend Muslim religious freedom then?
Are the Russian Jews any less Jewish, because they don’t circumcise? For some of us, child genital cutting is far more ‘over the line’ than circumcision. God bless the Bris Shalom.  It’s a much more humane way to bring a child into the world.  Judaism changes over time.  Otherwise, menstruating women would still be outside the tent.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Kelev
04/28/2011  at  07:12 PM
Whole Jews

I am a Jewish parent who kept my sons whole. There is actually a growing movement of Jews, secular and religious, orthodox and liberal, choosing to not to circumcise our children. It is simply not ethical to permanently alter the body of a child as part of a religious ceremony that they have no say in. Not only is doing that unethical, it is actually entirely in keeping with Jewish ethics to allow a child the freedom of choice to make this decision for themselves when they are an adult. And as more and more Jews decide not to circumcise their sons, as more and more Jewish boys decide to remain intact, Judaism will grow, adapt, and change for the better, just like it has, just like we have on other issues like women rabbis, homosexuality etc. etc. This will not be easy for many Jews, but it is better for the boys involved and it really is the only moral stance at this time in history. It is wrong to cut children’s genitals in the name of “god” and culture. Period.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by MisterEquality
04/28/2011  at  08:21 PM
Equality

How can ensuring the equal rights of both male and female children be anti-semitic? The First Amendment not only provides the freedom of religion and expression, but it also protects people FROM religion, such as others forcing their religion on them. The First Amendment, as well as the right to security and bodily integrity are supposed to be universal rights, that are equally applied to all. The 14th amendment provides equal protection under the law, and the fact that we even HAVE a female genital cutting bill is flat out unconstitutional. If circumcision is such an important part of your son’s life when he becomes an adult, he will be more accepting of his rite of passage, rather than having it forced upon him at the request of his parents. Everybody in this country is protected and is allowed to freely express their religion, and having someone else’s religious beliefs forced upon them in the form of genital surgery violates their right to freedom of religion. The female genital cutting bill can be considered anti islamic, but the congress ruled that protecting anyone under the age of 18 from unneccessary bodily surgery is not in violation of the first amendment. If we truly are a land of equality, under the 14th amendment, Jewish boys can also choose be circumcised if he so chooses. How is preserving your son’s own choice in his own religion and faith being anti-semetic?

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by jerry pritikin
04/28/2011  at  08:28 PM
Chutzpah Award for anti-Semites

What’s next, a ban on religious training for kids? It’s bad enough that
governments get into our bedrooms, and now our private parts. Beware, this is just the beginning of bad laws to follow. What will they do to Parents who have their son’s circumcised… arrest them?

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by MisterEquality
04/28/2011  at  08:39 PM
Bad law?

They made a similar law to this, it’s called the FGM Bill of 1996. Nobody here screamed for Islamic rights, nor did theu object. If anyone circumcises their daughter, regardless of their religion, yes, they would be thrown in jail. In fact, a man was sentenced to 10 years for doing that, and in some states you have to register as a sex offender. If the girl died, he would have been charged with murder.

Now, over 100 boys die in our country every year due to complications from circumcision, and are his parents charged with murder? No, of course not. It’s a parent’s choice to cut off part of their child if it’s a boy, but a federal offense if it’s a girl. Really, you’re just being hypocritical by yelling about “your religion” and “your rights” when you’re infringing upon your son’s religion and rights, not to mention, his body.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Kelev
04/28/2011  at  09:33 PM
Pro-Jewish

This measure to ban child circumcision is not “anti-Semitic.” Many of the supporters of the ban are ourselves Jewish, and we are working on behalf of Jewish boys to remain whole, to choose for themselves the nature and shape of their bodies and their religious practice.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Marilyn Milos RN
04/29/2011  at  10:54 AM
Freedom of Religion

The ban on circumcision of a normal minor will not eliminate the right of an informed adult to consent to circumcision for himself for personal preference, cultural conditioning, or religious affiliation. What it does is protect the rights of the child until he is old enough to protect himself or make such a personal decision for himself. With regard to freedom of religion, any child born in America is a citizen and protected by the US Constitution. If that child’s body is marked as a Muslim or Jew, his freedom of religion has been denied. So, this law will protect infants and children until they are old enough to make such important decisions for themselves about their own bodies.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own



Leave a Comment

In order to post a comment, you must first log in.
Are you looking for user registration? Or have you forgotten your password?



Auto-login on future visits