resources
Thursday, February 3, 2011 | return to: views, letters


Share
 

letters

Follow j. on   and 

Not sorry to see Joe go

Joe Lieberman was/is, in the Yiddish word, a “frumak” (“Lieberman built bridges for over a decade — and then burned them right and left,” Jan. 28). A “frumak” is a hypocrite: his piety is false. This is the person who comfortably twisted himself for any cause on any side for his personal political profit.

  Joe supported wars in which he never served. He cast loud judgments on Clinton although, as Jews, we leave such judgments to a superior being.

  Ever in the spotlight for his own political gain, this “frumak” is a disgrace. Good riddance.

Ruth Gordon, Cloverdale

 

We all want a secure Israel

The draft U.N. resolution statement that may be submitted by Palestinians to the Security Council later this year is in line with U.S. policy on settlements across eight bipartisan administrations. If Israel were to stop settlement growth and the U.S. assert bolder vision, the resolution would not be submitted.

  Loyalty has many ingredients. J Street certainly sees the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as one among many dynamics in the Middle East, but also understands that this is the time for loyalty to the vision of Israel as a democracy, side by side with a Palestinian state.

  Who among us wants less than a secure, democratic Israel? Let us agree to disagree on strategy, but not demonize one another for our different takes on what will bring peace and justice.

Molly Freeman, Berkeley, J Street S.F. Bay Area

 

Settlements mean status quo

Rep. Gary Ackerman severed ties with J Street after it urged Israel last month to put forth its own peace initiative to prevent the U.N. Security Council from voting on a resolution calling for Israel to halt settlement building in Palestinian territories. But if the Security Council does vote on the resolution, J Street opposes a U.S. veto — which would sharply compromise U.S. credibility in the region, since the proposed resolution mirrors 40 years of American policy.

   Ackerman’s reaction is, however, understandable; many American Jews resist any perceived criticism of Israel. To be sure, no one who loves Israel wishes to see such a resolution.

   However, it’s also true that a negotiated peace based on a two-state solution is supported by a majority of American Jews and a majority of Israelis. But as settlement building continues there are no negotiations, and without negotiations there’s no settlement, and without a settlement the status quo continues. An unstable stalemate is not good for Israeli security, and not good for American standing in the Middle East.

   The events taking place in Tunisia and Egypt highlight the importance of a stable peace between Israel and Palestine — important for the U.S. and important for Israel.

Michael J. Cooper, Lafayette


Comments

Posted by Dan Spitzer
02/03/2011  at  01:41 PM
J Street Suckers Local "Convenient Idiots" a la JVP

Freeman and Cooper follow the old J Street saw in which Israel is supposed to give up certain lands and alter its policies in exchange for what? Certainly J Street and the UN don’t really believe that the Palestinians will ultimately affirm approaching any semblance of peace short of the ridiculous “right of return”—which will NEVER happen.

Also, Israel is supposed to stop construction in its capital city. No other country in the world has been subjected to such an absurdity. Can you imagine that the US cease construction in Washington, Britain stop building in London, France in Paris? You get the idea!

Look, I oppose Jewish settlements in the West Bank. But they make up 1.7% of the West Bank and anyone who believes that simply giving up the Jewish settlements there will bring a permanent peace is naive in the extreme. Or, like J Street, doesn’t really give a fig for Israel.

Indeed, let’s stop hearing this nonsense that J Street cares about Israel. All it does is condemn the Jewish State w/o any corresponding critique of the Palestinians or the Arab world. It tries to ingratiate the odious Judge Goldstone with US Congressmen. And it is funded by the richest of the anti-Zionists, George Soros. If the suckers who support j Street like Ms. Freeman really think that fraudulent organization truly cares about Israel, well—I have bridge to sell ‘em.

Local J Street advocates—stop buying that sickening snake oil! It comes from the same toxic well as the repugnant JVP, aka Jewish Voice for Palestine…

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by sol rosenberg
02/03/2011  at  09:15 PM
Flogging Molly Freeman with reality

You all wanna see what a palestinian state would look like? and this is regardless of how many concessions Israel makes or much money the U.S. and the E.U. would through in it. all you have to do is look to labanon, tunisia, iran, yemen, egypt and so on. there’s your “palestine” and your wake up call J street. molly and company are nothing but more soros funded leftist terror apologists. speaking of which where’s janice? i miss her.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by sol rosenberg
02/03/2011  at  09:22 PM
As for Mr. Cooper . . .

The comment I just left before this one applies to you as well. Wake up and smell the dictatorship and radical islamic aromas that comes from the arab world and are as much a part of their society as the sand beneath their feet. I know your going to right me off as a right wing racist but you know I’m right.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by ssholin
02/04/2011  at  08:39 AM
To Ruth Gordon

Your write that we as Jews leave judgment to a superior being yet your judgment of Joe Lieberman sounds rather harsh and hateful. It might have been more meaningful to judge the behavior, not the person.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by craven_maven
02/04/2011  at  11:28 AM
Lieberman is a corrupt politician.

Lieberman is a corrupt politician. Back before the market crash of 2000, when he sat on the Senate committee overseeing financial practices, he voted against accounting reforms that would have mitigated, if not prevented, the crash . He placed the special interests of investment houses located in his home state of Connecticut over national interests and business ethics.

Whether or not Lieberman is a Jew, whether or not he is a “friend” of Israel is irrelevant. The best “friend” Israel can have is a robust, prosperous US, not one crippled by crooked politicians like Lieberman.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Dan Spitzer
02/04/2011  at  11:45 AM
Worse than Corrupt

I agree, Craven. But even worse than is financial shenanigans, Lieberman supported throughout Bush’s campaign Dubya’s ridiculous and costly intervention in and occupation of Iraq.

When the US should have been short-circuiting our real enemies, al Queda and Taliban in Afghanistan and NW Pakistan while they were still vulnerable, Lieberman threw his complete support to Bush and Cheney—oil men supreme—and their disgusting Iraqi caper which drew manpower and monies away from the real source of our enemies.

Indeed, even after it was proven that Bush had lied about weapons of mass destruction, Lieberman continued to support a war which resulted in thousands of unnecessary Iraqi and US deaths. For this, Lieberman and Dubya should one day be tried as war criminals.

May Lieberman’s name forever lie in infamy…

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Dan Spitzer
02/04/2011  at  05:54 PM
J Street's Big Funder Calls Israel the Main Stumbling Block in Egypt-US Relations

Dear Ms. Freeman and Mr. Cooper:

Do you really think that J Street cares at all about Israel when its biggest funder was responsible for the following:

In an op-ed piece in yesterday’s Washington Post concerning the upheaval in Egypt and the U.S. response, George Soros wrote that “The main stumbling block is Israel.”

RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks responded:
“Only the most obsessed opponents of Israel could weave Israel into the unfolding turmoil in Egypt. It is outrageous to lay responsibility for future peace and stability in Egypt on the doorstep of Israel, as Soros does by calling Israel the ‘main stumbling block’.

J Street has, once again, proven itself to be an organization antithetical to Israel’s well-being. Now we might think differently if it returned the money Soros donated to it. But don’t hold your breath…

Login to reply to this comment or post your own



Leave a Comment

In order to post a comment, you must first log in.
Are you looking for user registration? Or have you forgotten your password?



Auto-login on future visits