resources
Thursday, August 26, 2010 | return to: views, letters


Share
 

letters

Follow j. on   and 

Supporting campus efforts

The Jewish Community Relations Council applauds Hillel’s efforts to prepare students and professionals to counter efforts to delegitimize Israel on campus as described in j.’s  article, “Hillels prepare to answer anti-Israel campus forces” (Aug. 20), and the related editorial.

This past school year, JCRC, along with 20 other Jewish organizations active in the Northern California Israel Campus Agency Roundtable, worked closely with Bay Area Hillels to successfully counter various anti-Israel efforts. The growing threat to Israel’s legitimacy as represented by the anti-Israel and anti-peace boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, along with the need to increase opportunities for civil discourse on campus, necessitates this expanded campus-community cooperation.

Thank you to the j. for your in-depth coverage of this important and encouraging effort. As always, the JCRC will continue to support Hillel and student activists on campus with their Israel education and advocacy programs aimed at reaching the diverse student population found on our college campuses.

Julie L. Bernstein

Director of Campus and Community Programs

Middle East Project, Jewish Community Relations Council

 

Hillel strategy misguided

It’s good that Hillel is developing a pro-Israel strategy to counter anti-Israel activity on college campuses. However, their strategy lacks what it needs the most, which is a clear and consistent message that Israel has an absolute right to exist as a Jewish state and will fight for that right, regardless of Arab claims that the land is theirs. Without such an unequivocal declaration of ownership, Israel can never defeat the accusation that it’s occupying stolen Arab land.

The Hillel strategy is purely defensive in nature, and contains nothing that would frighten or intimidate Israel’s campus foes, or make them think they’ll have to pay a price for their nonstop slander and incitement against the Jewish state. If this is the strongest strategy Hillel can devise, the campus situation will likely get worse rather than better.

Martin Wasserman   |   Sunnyvale

 

Youth for hire

Sherri W. Morr’s op-ed, “For job seekers, the Jewish community lacks kindness” (Aug. 13), fails to address the Jewish future and the need to recruit young people to work in Jewish communities to maintain our existence.

Present Jewish leaders are already worried about how to engage young people with the community. They have set up engagement and volunteer programs for 20-somethings. But they are not hiring them as an additional incentive to be involved.

I respect the fact that Morr is an experienced Jewish professional and communities are in financial trouble. I am without a job too but can work for less in exchange for experience. I have a master’s in Jewish studies from the University of Michigan where I focused on American Jewish history and worked at its Hillel part-time as an administrative assistant.

During my interviews, I gave hiring managers an opportunity to hire and train an empathetic young Jew

who is actually interested in working in and caring about the community.

There is no future for the American Jewish community if leaders don’t start bringing in and training eager young people, the next generation of Jewish leaders, to advocate for the community in the United States and abroad.

Sara Halpern   |   Rochester, N.Y.

 

Pledge is lip service

How “kind” of some Orthodox rabbis to sign a pledge welcoming gay Jews into their synagogues (“Gay Jews have a ‘home in Jewish life,’ Orthodox rabbis say,” Aug. 6). Why would you not welcome someone who looked and acted just like everyone else? This is just blowing smoke and accomplishes nothing.

The Torah has many laws, some of which are so primitive as never to be considered in a more sensible and humane world than existed in biblical times. By denying the right of so many to a life of happiness, security, legal rights, etc., these rabbis may be following halachah but, in my opinion, are violating a most profound and constitutional entitlement.

If they cannot see the difference between their interpretation of centuries-old (and obsolete) halachah and current reality, then they truly are not doing the “right thing” and still abandon those that would come to their shul.

Naomi Karlin   |   Oakland

 

Mosque plan is ‘cruel’

Thirty-one rabbis signed a letter in opposition to the ADL’s opposition to the mosque near ground zero (“ADL takes heat for opposing Islamic center near ground zero,” Aug. 6). The mosque should bring our communities together by promoting religious tolerance and dialogue. Very politically correct.

Would these 31 rabbis be in favor of the American Nazi Party opening bookstores across street from their temples citing the same reasons?

It happened in San Francisco in 1977. The Nazi bookstore opened across the street from Temple E’munah. Politically correct? A survivor and his son could not tolerate this vile symbol in their community. Morris and Allen Weiss were arrested for destroying this bookstore. The community rallied around them and a law in San Francisco was passed outlawing the display of those symbols as an incitement to riot.

A mosque near ground zero is an incitement to riot. It is cruel to the families who suffered loss, a threat to the peace of the community and an insult to human sensibilities. Even moderate Muslims deny the Holocaust, the right of Israel to exist and think of Jews as devils. We can only reason with them out of strength. They see the 31 rabbis on their knees groveling to the prophet of destruction.

Norman Weiss   |   Orinda

 

Support Women of the Wall

Thank you for the story about the Women of the Wall photo campaign (“Women urged to pose holding a Torah,” Aug. 13).

There was only one thing missing: how to do it! Women of the Wall has made it very easy — go to http://www.womenofthewall.org.il and click on “Take a Stand!” Upload your photo and fill in the information; WOW will forward all the pictures.

This is a wonderful opportunity to support WOW and religious pluralism in Israel. Many of us rallied to make our voices heard about the Rotem bill (Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu received over 60,000 emails within a week). Now let’s make ourselves visible and show that Torah and women together are not an anomaly in the Jewish world.

Some Bay Area synagogues are scheduling photo shoots. Contact your rabbi and/or synagogue administrator to help organize an event for your community. And please send the link to the WOW website to all the Jewish women you know.

The ultra-Orthodox in Israel are exerting more pressure to protect theirs as the only way to be a Jew in Israel. We can reverse the rising tide of the “haredi-tization” of our spiritual homeland, and further the acceptance of non-Orthodox Jews to practice in Israel as we do in the rest of the world.

Sara Yakira Heckelman   |   San Francisco


Comments

Posted by Dan Spitzer
08/27/2010  at  10:26 AM
Why J's Editor is Known as "Craven" Klein

In last week’s on line edition of J, the site was bombarded with the anti-Semitic screed of a loony left organization known as the Jewish Anti-Zionist Network. While Editor Marc Klein received requests by several of us to remove the most offensive Jew-hating posts, he left it on the site, thereby continuingto permit hate speech to be trumped by his notion of free speech.

But for Klein, free speech extends solely to those who agree with his editorial stances. For better than a year now, I and others have attempted to alert the Jewish community to the fact that rather than combating BDS against Israel on campus, Hillel under the “watch” of the inert Rabbi Adam Kelman, has actually served as a spawing ground for those who support BDS. SJP and the Israel-loathing Kesher Enoshi have been permitted free reign at Hillel by Kelman. Accordingly, Hillel has been a most influential staging ground for enemies of Israel to promulgate BDS on the UC Berkeley campus.

Last week, Klein published both a fawning feature AND and editorial praising Hillel’s alleged work against BDS. Nothing could be further from the truth and I said so in a highly tempered letter to J.

No surprise: Klein failed to print the letter just as he has refused to publish anything telling the truth about the odious situation existent for quite some time at Hillel.

When a magazine writes both a feature and an editorial flagrantly flying in the face of the truth and it receives letters critical of what it has highlighted in print, that is not just bad journalism, it’s a detriment to the very community which it is supposed to serve.

Come on Mr. Klein, it’s time to summon the courage to publish what is really happening at Hillel in J’s print edition. If you aren’t receptive to views which differ from your own, perhaps you might find another profession to be appropriate…

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Abraham Miller
08/27/2010  at  12:11 PM
point of clarity

As long as this community fails to comprehend the reality of what went on at Hillel and how Hillel contributed to the BDS movement at Berkeley, we will encounter additional anti-Israel activities on campus sustained by Jewish students from Hillel. Julie Bernstein’s enthusiastic letter at the beginning of this column is part of the problem, not part of the solution.  If we are to move forward, we need to understand both Hillel’s contribution to fighting the BDS campaign and Hillel’s contributions to promoting it.  As long as Julie Bernstein and the “J” are cheerleaders for Hillel, we are going to wake up one day and find the BDS movement has succeeded, not because of its competence but because of our incompetence and our unwillingness as a community to confront reality.  With the likes of Ms. Bernstein and her ill-considered applause, the BDS movement is assured of victory.  Last time, the BDS movement lost the battle, but the movement possesses real leadership and a formidable knowledge of the manipulation of political symbols.  For all practical purposes, it won the war of ideas last year.  Its definition of the situation both persists and gains credence.  When it comes to our leadership vs. theirs, there is no comparison. I don’t support the BDS movement, but having attended some of their sessions and watched them in action, their unpaid amateurs are far and away more sophisticated and courageous than our paid professionals. If leadership counts, they will win.  We are incapable of facing reality.  They have no trouble dealing with it. Our leadership is incapable of self-criticism and introspection. The “J”, as Mr. Spitizer notes, has camouflaged the situation and enabled us to live with our delusions over last school year’s Pyhrric victory and this year’s anticipated mobilization.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by theother
08/27/2010  at  01:31 PM
Muslims are Not Nazis

for two consecutive weeks, J Weekly has published letters it has received comparing Muslims to Nazis, as Norman Weiss does here. The charge is not against a self-described Muslim government, but simply all Muslims.

How many folks like Ahmed Sharif have to suffer before JWeekly says enough is enough?

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Theresa
08/28/2010  at  02:56 PM
nazi comparison

The editor of this paper made a commitment to leave the comments section wide open, for better or for worse.  There has been hateful attacks against Jews here as well.
Perhaps if all sides realize how hateful comparisons are to the Nazis, they would stop.  But all over the web, and at every anti-israel rally locally, Nazi comparisons are used when discussing Israel, even though the EU classifies it as a form of anti-Semitism.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Rabbi Menachem Creditor
08/27/2010  at  03:28 PM
What if

What if those who imagine theirs was the prescription for addressing the complexities of the UC Berkeley campus committed to 10 hours each volunteering at Hillel?  Having spent considerable time with Berkeley students, on and off campus, it is my firm belief that the clarity these comments claim would be a bit less, and the support of Hillel quite a bit more.  We have work to do as a community to strengthen our ties to Israel.  Attacking the very Jewish organizations and leaders who fight for these ties is, at best, a waste of limited communal resources.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Abraham Miller
08/27/2010  at  04:45 PM
What if Indeed?

The situation at Hillel is not in the least complex.  There is nothing complex about embracing a group such as Kesher Enoshi, permitting them to use Hillel resources, and standing by as its members recruit naive Jewish students who end up playing prominent roles in Students for Justice in Palestine and in the BDS movement. Recognizing that the community is subsidizing the BDS campaign through those limited communal resources—to which Rabbi Creditor refers—is a first step in dealing with a problem that is in its essence quite simple.  Either Hillel is there to promote Israel’s right to exist or it is there to provide resources to those who would destroy it.  That is not a very complicated problem. The BDS movement would look a lot different if there weren’t active Hillel students standing in front of the student body denouncing Israel and affirming BDS. Having a Shabbath Service orchestrated by Kesher Enoshi members and their Students for Justice in Palestine friends, in the midst of the BDS campaign, is an insult to the pro-Zionist Jewish students and to those who fund Hillel.  Somehow I fail to comprehend how Hillel’s ties to Israel were strengthened by this event and Kesher Enoshi’s advocacy of BDS.  How are our communal ties to Israel strengthened when many pro-Zionist students feel unwelcome there and hold their meetings at Chabad.  Certainly, Rabbi Creditor must speak to these students as well.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Leon Mayeri
08/31/2010  at  04:03 PM
Hillel's association with SJP et al should not be condoned

The Hillel issue is of particular importance at a time when vicious anti-Israel bashing gains credibility through association and furthers hate speech on campus communities nationwide. The groups who have found their way into Hillel represent a virulent form of anti semitic hostility and have no place in an institution that supports norms of Jewish life. The fact that the membership of these groups (Kesher Enoshi, SJP, etc)  includes Jews is significant, mainly because it serves to justify the dangerous behavior and enable the ardent groups who want to have Israel destroyed.

Kesher Enoshi and SJP have no place in an institution like Hillel. It is remarkable that Hillel’s directors gave them any credibility whatsoever, and even more remarkable that this destructive collaboration was never criticized by a publication like J.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own



Leave a Comment

In order to post a comment, you must first log in.
Are you looking for user registration? Or have you forgotten your password?



Auto-login on future visits