resources
Thursday, June 24, 2010 | return to: news & features, local


Share
 

Jewish Film Festival reveals 2010 lineup — readers begin sounding off

by dan pine, staff writer

Follow j. on   and 

One year after its screening of “Rachel” sparked a local Jewish community uproar, the San Francisco Jewish Film Festival has released the schedule for this year’s festival, its 30th annual starting July 24.

Is another potential “Rachel” lurking among the lineup of 57 films?

Though organizers think not, and are confident that controversy will be avoided this summer, they also say they have no intention of backing away from challenging films.

“We have no wish to make milquetoast out of engaging and sometimes challenging film programming,” said Peter Stein, the festival’s executive director. “It’s been the hallmark of this festival to ask hard questions.”

 

BAfilm fest
Jay Rosenblatt (left) and Peter Stein discuss the upcoming San Francisco Jewish Film Festival. photo/cathleen maclearie
Last summer the “hard” part came when Cindy Corrie, mother of the late pro-Palestinian activist Rachel Corrie, appeared for an interview and Q&A session following the San Francisco screening of “Rachel.” In addition, the film, itself controversial, was co-presented by two organizations many deem to have anti-Israel leanings.

 

That perfect storm angered pro-Israel forces in the community.

In turn, the S.F.-based Jewish Community Federation took a lot of heat for providing funding to the festival. As a consequence, it issued grantee guidelines earlier this year to make sure its funds won’t provide a platform for those advocating boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel.

Although the new guidelines have no financial impact on this year’s festival — the funds from JCF for the 2010 event were allocated before the guidelines went into effect — the federation and the film festival nevertheless have been finding common ground.

“Continuing the strong relationship between SFJFF and JCF is truly important for both institutions. We value one another’s work highly,” Stein said. “This year we have had an ongoing dialogue with JCF about the new guidelines, their merits and potential drawbacks. We are confident that nothing in our mission, programs, films or values flies against the guidelines, and we are committed to being an engaged partner with JCF during this polarized time in American Jewish life.”

Said federation CEO Jennifer Gorovitz: “The JCF, joined by the Jewish Community Relations Council, has convened numerous follow-up discussions with festival leadership about the full spectrum of issues stemming from last summer’s festival and the expectations and application of the JCF’s funding guidelines. We are pleased that festival leadership has stated that it plans to abide by the guidelines, and that it will present an array of films aimed at appealing to a broad cross-section of the community.”

One change this year is that presenters, co-presenters and promotional partners will no longer be linked to individual films. And Jewish Voice for Peace, one of the co-presenters of “Rachel” last summer, is not part of the festival this year.

Nevertheless, added the festival’s new program director Jay Rosenblatt, “I don’t think we shied away from showing things as they are. Quality came first.”

“We remain dedicated to being an arts organization that reflects and helps build a Jewish community that values diversity of thought, debate and dialogue — even on difficult topics,” Stein added. “We look forward to working with JCF to ensure that both institutions are strengthening the community we have each loved and served for so long.”

Potentially controversial selections this summer could include “Budrus,” a documentary about the Israeli security barrier cutting through an Arab village. Also, there’s “My So-Called Enemy,” which follows two groups of young women –– Arabs and Israeli Jews –– at a conference and their diverging lives afterward.

These are two among several films that touch on the Israeli and Palestinian conflict. But as always, the subject matter of the programming spans the entire Jewish universe.

“This being our 30th anniversary, we wanted to bring a celebratory energy to the festival,” Rosenblatt said.

Part of that will come in the form of more live music, including an appearance by Jewish rapper Socalled (in conjunction with the documentary about him (“The ‘Socalled’ Movie”).

The opening night feature is “Saviors in the Night,” a true Holocaust-era story about a non-Jewish German family that hides a Jewish woman and her daughter. Marga Spiegel, the 98-year-old real-life daughter, will be coming to San Francisco to attend the screening.

The topper on this year’s list of festival themes is “Tough Guys: Images of Jewish Gangsters in Film.” Titles set for screening include 1991’s “Bugsy” (starring Warren Beatty), the 1932 version of “Scarface” and “Lepke,” a 1975 film starring Tony Curtis as Louis Lepke.

The 57 films in the lineup will run from July 24 through Aug. 9 at the Castro Theatre and the JCCSF in San Francisco, the Roda Theatre in Berkeley, the Smith Rafael Film Center in San Rafael and Cinearts @ Palo Alto Square.

Stein and Rosenblatt said the 57 films were the lucky ones chosen out of more than 600 submissions, and both say that paring down the list was not easy.

“I was very considerate and deliberate in the rejection letters,” Rosenblatt said. “Being filmmakers ourselves, we know how disappointing these letters can be. We got feedback saying ‘This was the best rejection letter we ever got.’”


The San Francisco Jewish Film Festival begins July 24. Schedule and information: http://www.sfjff.org.


Comments

Posted by sol rosenberg
06/24/2010  at  04:40 PM
The SFJFF, I'm Still Not Going

Peter Stien still won’t admit what a colossal foul up last summer’s Rachel was? To say nothing about him having his job still? I encourage everybody to avoid the SFJFF this year until Stien submits a public apology or steps down.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Jack Kessler
06/24/2010  at  07:32 PM
Challenging? Really?

Peter Stein’s description by implication of the film “Corrie” as “challenging” is completely dishonest.

A movie is challenging if it makes one think and perhaps reassess one’s views. 

“Corrie”  was just the opposite - it was shabby propaganda expressing mindless bigotry.  It’s object was to suppress thinking and replace it with half-truths and outright lies.

That Peter Stein could characterize it that way, suggests that he is so egocentric that he learned absolutely nothing from the entire scandal he and SFJFF provoked. 

Maybe Peter Stein should do some thinking and reassessing of his views.

But don’t count on it.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by califlefty
06/24/2010  at  08:50 PM
Well, here we go again!

What were they thinking - that a cinematic “flotilla” would go unnoticed?

To best understand why this film is just another tool for the de-legitimize Israel campaign you need to read this interview with Ayed Morrar (nom deguerre Abu Ahmed) - http://www.justvision.org/en/portrait/96511/interview 

“Budrus” is a feature documentary film about Ayed Morrar who unites local Fatah and Hamas members along with Israeli supporters in an unarmed movement to “save” his village from the separation barrier.

While I don’t question the motivation to use non-violent means to achieve political goals, I remind myself that the non-violent struggle of this village was a singular demonstration of those tactics during a period of bloody attacks against Israel’s civilian population and that the separation wall, as ugly as it may be, brought those attacks to an end. To focus on the events at Budrus and deny the overwhelming violence perpetrated by the PA is hypocrisy and shallow and only serves to make this movie a set-piece designed to not only de-legitimize Israel, but to de-humanize Israelis as well.
This film has no place in the film festival and I predict it will be a magnet and rally point for all the usual anti-Zionists who can’t wait to portray as immoral beasts—- once again!

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Janice
06/24/2010  at  10:35 PM
Budrus and the wall

Budrus was one of the featured films at the San Francisco Film Festival. This was an inspiring film of how non-violence which involved Palestinians, Israelis and internationals worked to move the wall away from the village of Budrus. Perhaps Jews will be unhappy as I was to see giant Israeli bulldozers uproot hundreds of ancient olive trees, the source of the economy for many in the village. Budrus is only one village where the residents have chosen non-violent resistance to the theft of their lands. So far several of the protesters have been killed or maimed including Emily Henochowicz,a young Israeli=American woman who lost her eye when a member of the border police aimed a tear gas canister directly at her face when she was non-violently protesting the killings on the Mavi Marmara.

Palestinians and those who want peace and justice would have raised no objection to the building of the wall had it been built on the Green Line. But this wall was meant to grab territory and to pen the Palestinians into small ghettos.

I am sorry that there are those who will boycott the film festival because it dares to show some of the warts that some do not want the world to see. Nevertheless, the warts are there and they are ugly.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by proudisraeli
06/25/2010  at  06:26 AM
Interesting point

Janice—I also saw Budrus at SFIFF.  One interesting point about the films is the part where the protagonists daughter says something to the effect that “she did not realize that some ISraelis were like that (i.e. believe in their cause and be willing to help).  That part alone says plenty of how Israelis are viewed by Palestinians—in other words Jews/Israelis are constantly vilified and portrayed as evil by the Palestinians—the people are indoctrinated to hate Israel. So naturally it comes as a surprise to this young lady that not all Israelis (in fact none of them really are as evil as portrayed by the Palestinians) are as “bad” as she had been told all of her life.
Very important point, which I am not sure many people picked up on.
It would also be refreshing to see a film that exposed the “warts” on the Palestinian side—oh, I forgot there is no free press on the arab side of the equation.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by califlefty
06/25/2010  at  10:14 AM
A little digging ......

This is not the first film that the festival is presenting by a “Just Vision” filmmaker, they previously presented “Bilin My Love” by Shai Carmelli Pollak who is credited as filmmaker on” Budrus”. Were these productions shot and edited simultaneously? Pollak is up front about his motivations—“I did not come to Bil’in as a filmmaker, but as an activist, to take part in the protest against the land theft caused by the separation barrier.” Well I wonder if Mr. Pollak was able to set aside his mindset when making “Budrus”,
I doublt it. I think he (they) found an obscure story in which Israelis behave badly so as to suggest that it says something terribly negative about Israeli society as a whole.

Anti-Israel propaganda works by shining a hostile light that is so intense it’s sole purpose to create emotive and politically charged language that contributes to it’s demonization. Just Vision is able to produce films and (from their website): “.....increase media attention and international support for Palestinians and Israelis working nonviolently to resolve the conflict. In six years, she and her team have created a far-reaching and ever-growing network of peace builders, community leaders, educators, journalists, film enthusiasts, activists and organizations eager to support the Palestinian and Israeli civic leaders profiled by Just Vision.” Wow! The fact of the matter is that Just Vision is deeply entwined in the NGO networks that have associations with organizations that exist to de-legitimize Israel, look at the links they present on their web-site.

A question the SFJFF and inquiring Jewish minds might want to ask—So who funds this network building and film production?

There is a vast international funding network traceable back to Saudi and Kuwaiti money through “C-100 Projects” see:  http://www.weforum.org/en/Communities/FaithCommunities/c100/Projects/index.htm
That ultimately reaches NGOs that shield the donors from their anti-Israel operations. Here’s an example: The benignly sounding “UN Alliance of Civilizations” see: http://www.unaoc.org/  whose purpose supposedly is to counter western misconceptions about the nature of Islamic and Muslim societies through education and dialogue. Who heads the UNAC? Why that paragon of interfaith cooperation none other the Turkish PM and anti-Semite Recep Tayyip Erdogan. What has any of this to do with a Jewish Film Festival? Ordinarily the answer would be “nothing” but dig into Just Vision’s key personnel as listed on their site and you come across Lucas Welch, Founder/Executive Director of Soliya - an NGO listed in the C-100 link above.  Maybe all these associations are merely “innocent” but when I see Wissam Nasr (the same Wissam Nasr that runs NY CAIR??? - I note Just Vision conveniently does not provide his affiliation) warning lights go off.

OK, there’s smoke, but is there fire? I don’t know but lets at least take a hard look.

The bigger question is why is the SFJFF either knowingly or unknowingly being a conduit for voices that align themselves against our own best self-interest and self-preservation?

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Janice
06/25/2010  at  12:09 PM
Why Palestinians view Israelis as they do

Proud Israeli - It is not unusual for people to have bad feelings about those who occupy them and take their land or drive them from their homes.

When the only Israelis that Palestinians usually see are well armed settlers or armed IDF soldiers bound on enforcing the occupation it is not surprising that the Palestinians have negative views of Israelis.

When children see their parents humiliated or killed by IDF troops, their homes bulldozed or bombed by Israel (over 20,000 since 1967) or their fathers & brothers dragged away from their homes in the middle of the night they cannot help but feel that those Israelis are indeed not their friends.

I am grateful for those courageous Israelis who stand up to the occupation. I am grateful to Women in Black, Gush Shalom, Machsom Watch, B’Tselem and the other Israeli groups who know that the occupation is killing us all. I am grateful for the Israelis who buck the government and stand in solidarity with Palestinians who are non-violently struggling to save their lands from Israeli confiscation. It is those Israelis, and not the IDF or the settlers, who show that their are good Israelis who do not believe in taking the land of another people or oppressing those people.

As for those who say there is no comparative groups on the Palestinian side one only needs to note that Israel has, over the years, arrested, deported or killed those who advocate non-violence.

The Palestinians will not buckle under, as Israel would like, to a continued subjugation of their people nor should they.

I wonder why Israel is so proud of itself when it continues to oppress another people. Not a thing of which to be proud.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by califlefty
06/25/2010  at  01:29 PM
There are many reasons we

There are many reasons we Jews are proud of Israel, if you need to “wonder” then perhaps you’d feel more comfortable posting where your opinions are shared.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Dan Spitzer
06/25/2010  at  05:38 PM
Janice Exposed

Janice regularly spews her anti-Israel venom on J’s commentary on line pages and it is instructive that she should praise, among others, Women in Black who call for BDS against Israel.

Tell us, Janice, why do you praise an organization which demands hurtful economic sanctions against the Middle East’s sole democracy? And why do you never criticize the Palestinians? Certainly, since you are a female you can’t possibly share the Palestinian penchant for suppressing their women. Or do you yourself actually concur with the manifest Palestinian’s acute practices of misogyny?

As for the screening of the film, Budrus, why does it have to be presented at the SFJFF? Surely, no pro-Palestinian group has ever screened a film showing anything positive about Israel or negative about the Palestinians. Let Israel-loathing groups like JVP, ISM, and SJP show this film, as they probably will.

Thanks for the good work, calilefty, for digging up the genesis of the overtly anti-Israel producers of this dreck…

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Dan Spitzer
06/25/2010  at  05:57 PM
The Crucial Question

It is easy to anticipate the usual drivel arising in “J” about the SFJFF’s right to choose. But what is key here: why does the SFJFF regularly permit itself to serve as a venue for pro-Palestinian propaganda and the castigation of Israel?

As noted, since there are plenty of other forums for such filmfare, it’s not as if those who wish to see such anti-Israel fodder screened won’t have opportunities to do so. For the SFJFF to annually present such films is a slap in the face to most of the Bay Area Jewish community…

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Janice
06/25/2010  at  07:36 PM
Interesting news

First of all I will agree that Israel is a democracy - a democracy for Jews while those who are not Jewish are second class citizens. But more than that, Israel is a theocracy where in many instances secular Jews must bow to the dictates of the religious Jews.

Aside from that I think that those who damn the Jewish Film Festival for showing Budrus should know that on July 9 and 10 Budrus will be shown at the Jerusalem International FIlm Festival. Why are Jews in SF so afraid of having Budrus shown in San Francisco while at the same time it is being shown in Israel? Will you also damn the Jerusalem Film Festival as well?
Maybe so.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Dan Spitzer
06/25/2010  at  09:44 PM
The Answer is Easy

In Jerusalem, nobody is as ignorant as Janice, who calls Israel a “theocracy.” What a bloody joke such a comment tenders and the source of it must be rightly deemed a delusional fool.

Israelis, however, know the truth: that they have a free and open society, whereas the Palestinians-particularly in Gaza- operate on as much as Hamas can generate of Sharia-theocratic Islamic Law.

In sum, no one in Israel need be concerned at a Jerusalem-based film festival that pro-Palestinian propaganda will do harm, for the Israelis are fully aware of the truth of their situation. After all, they’re living it.

On the other hand, Americans have been bombarded by such rubbish as Janice herself has exhibited on this page that such propaganda which Budrus can engender might do some very real harm in it’s promulgation of untruths.

Janice, there is no reason why JVP, ISM, or whatever Israel-hating organizational rock you’ve climbed out from under cannot show Budrus. Of course, your minion, which sits around ratifying one another’s opinion, is free to do so.

But the SFJFF also has a free and open choice on whether to screen such cinematic rubbish and Mr. Stein and his board should have made the choice to let Israel’s enemies, some of whom as we’ve seen hilariously dub Israel a theocracy, show the film to their goose-stepping Amen Corner…

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Janice
06/26/2010  at  12:56 PM
Dan Spitzer -Israel is free

Dan Spitzer -
Israel is free and open you say. Lets say an Israeli wants to marry someone who is not Jewish. Can they have that ceremony in Israel? Why did my Israeli sister-in-law have to have a religious “get” in order to divorce her husband? Why is 93% of the land of Israel off bounds to Israeli Arabs? Why is it almost impossible for Israeli Arabs to live in certain areas in Israel? Why are Israeli Arab homes routinely demolished while those of Israeli Jews are not? Why is it almost impossible for Israeli Arabs or Palestinians in the Occupied Territories to get building permits? How many Israeli Arabs are allowed to live in the settlements?

Dan, the fact that I do not like Israel’s policies is due to the fact that I was brought up long ago with the idea that one people has no right to oppress another or to take their land. My dad back in 1947 raised tens of thousands of dollars to help the Jews drive out the British occupiers. He was told by a few members of the Yishuv who came to ask him to raise the money that the new state would be a bi-national one with Jews and Arabs having equal rights and equal representation. But, sadly,  that was never the intention of Israel’s founding fathers.

A few years later, in the early 1950s, several disillusioned Israelis came to visit my dad to tell of the racism against the Arabs who survived the ethnic cleansing of 1948, an ethnic cleansing in which my now deceased American born brother-in-law participated as a member of the Palmach. When I asked him why he helped to drive the Arabs out at gunpoint from their homes in northern Israel across the border into Lebanon he responded, “We wanted their land and we didn’t want them on it.” I didn’t ask him if he killed anyone. I guess I just didn’t want to know.

Of course, in order to cover up the ethnic cleansing, the Israeli officials had to put out the story that the Arabs were told by their leaders to flee. This lie was demolished when the Israeli archives were opened in the 1980s and Israeli historians revealed the truth.

Finally, the fact that I criticize Israel does not mean that I embrace the policies of Hamas, an organization that would not exist had it not been for Israel’s brutal occupation. I find their actions around women and dissidents to be abhorrent.  Perhaps you are unaware of the fact that before the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza the Palestinians were among the most secular in the Arab world. The brutality of the ongoing occupation shoved many Palestinians into the world of fundamentalism.

What I don’t understand is why you expect the Palestinians to just take it as their lands and water resources are confiscated for the benefit of another people.

What I notice from all those who Stand With Israel No Matter What is that there is been no response when I write about the destruction of homes, the bulldozing of ancient olive trees, or the brutality of the occupation.  I guess you think that brutalizing the Palestinians is OK but one should remember that Never Again applies to everyone.

There are more and more Jews around the world and in Israel who feel as I do. Our numbers are growing.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Dan Spitzer
06/26/2010  at  02:07 PM
More Moronic Propaganda

Israel has indeed some archaic marriage and divorce laws, not just for marrying outside of the faith but also for non-orthodox Jewish unions. But this pales in comparison to the horrific suppression of women by the Palestinians, the commonplace “honor murder” of daughters who are thought to transgress the wishes of their fathers, the outright brutalization of gays, the torture and murder of dissidents.

Janice, you know quite well the truth of these realities manifest in both the West Bank and Gaza and such cultural practices are not the cause of anything the Jews have done, although you ridiculously place the blame the Israeli Jews. In fact, they have been the monstrous realities of Palestinian culture and most Arabic societies for centuries.

None of these horrific Islamic cultural consequences hold for Israel, one of the freest countries in the world for the rights of women, gays, and dissidents. If you don’t acknowledge this, Janice, it simply speaks once again to your seemingly unbounded ignorance.

So to remotely compare the lot of Israelis and Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza when it comes to freedoms is absurd in the extreme. Moreover, Israel’s Arab citizens are accorded the same laws as its Jews, with the obvious and understandable exception of serving in the military.

And to say 93% of Israel is out of bounds to its Arab citizens is a falsehood of the worst order and typical of the propaganda your ilk disseminates. Indeed, how many Jews do you believe would be welcome to live in Palestinian controlled realms of the West Bank or Gaza? The answer is, of course, none: any attempt to do so would result in their immediate murder.

Ever the pathetically indoctrinated propagandist, you say the Israelis are engaged in “ethnic cleansing,” a term about as inapplicable as is your lowlife fellow propagandists’ indiscriminate use of the term “apartheid.”

Indeed, there is no hiding the fact that if the Israelis had wished to engage in the ethnic cleaning of the Palestinians, it has the firepower to do it in a heartbeat—yet in the face of the most murderous provocation, Israel has not done so.

Conversely, should-perish the thought-your beloved Arabs ever triumph militarily, even the a mentally-challenged Janice knows what the outcome would be…

Speaking of ethnic cleansing, Janice, why do your Palestinian pets advocate the genocide of Israeli Jews in the covenants of both Hamas and Fatah? Why are Palestinian children taught from primary school on to grow up to become the Shaheed martyrs of Jews? You find nothing of this sort in any aspect of Israeli governance and education.

So please in the future keep your toxic idiocies within the septic tanks of your JVP and ISM fellows. I think the decent thinking readers of this site have had a bellyfull of your bilge; I know I have… 

Of course, you and your ISM comrades oppose the destruction of homes whose lower levels are used to tunnel munitions just as you oppose the security barrier which has been so effective in halting Palestinian suicide bombings of Israeli civilians. I bet that chafes you just as it does the Palestinians.

Have the Palestinians lost some homes, olive trees, in order for the Israelis to safeguard their people from Arab terrorists? Are Palestinians inconvenienced by checkpoints? Of course. Are all these measures worth the life of a single Jewish life? You bet. And if you spend any time in Israel, Janice, the life that is saved could be your own. Your fine Palestinians don’t care who they murder, so long as it is a Jew. What a sick society…

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by califlefty
06/26/2010  at  02:34 PM
"Janice" has effectively misdirected this

“Janice” has effectively misdirected this conversation away from the SFJFF and into generic anti-Israel polemics. Don’t fall for these tricks - use the ignore button.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Dan Spitzer
06/26/2010  at  05:11 PM
It's OK Calilefty

Janice provides a cogent example of how and why the SFJFF shouldn’t present anti-Israeli propaganda and speakers, such as Cindy Corrie, who spew it.

Films like “Rachel” and “Budrus” demonstrate how indoctrinated, delusional Israel-haters such as Janice can take misinformation and later try to promulgate it to others who also don’t know any better…

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Janice
06/26/2010  at  07:31 PM
Why aren't you there?

I really don’t understand why Dan and califlefty aren’t living in Israel. Surely, their love and loyalty for Israel seems to overwhelm their love and loyalty for the United States. I this a case of divided loyalty? Maybe.

I have had many reasons to be critical of my country but I have never held any country as equal to or better than my country.

Even as i demonstrated against the Vietnam War and worked for civil rights for blacks I still loved my country and I wanted to make it better. This is the land of my birth and the land to which I owe my allegiance. But you sound like the screamers in the streets who told those of us who were protesting to love it or leave it.

As for land allocation in Israel being 93% for Jews check this out at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Land_Administration
Exclusion of Arab citizens

Not a single new Arab town has been established since Israel was created in 1948. In January 2010, a bill proposed by Ahmed Tibi, an Arab Member of the Knesset, that called for land to be allocated equally to Jews and Arabs was rejected by the Ministerial Committee for Legislation. The bill was designed to provide counterbalance to a bill passed two weeks earlier that states that reception committees of Israeli communities can exercise discretion as to who may reside in their towns. According to Haaretz, “One consequence of that [the latter] bill is that Israeli Arabs would not be able to live in those towns if the reception committees decide so.”[

You will also see that the Israel Land Administration controls 93% of the land and that land cannot be leased to non-Jews.

As for comparing Israel to other countries in the region this is stupid as none of the other countries even try to say that they are a democracy.

No sense in continuing this. All I can say is that until Israel ends its occupation and pulls back to the 67 line or becomes a bi-national state with equal rights and privileges for all, there will be no peace.

and speaking of indoctrination it seems to have worked well with you both.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by califlefty
06/27/2010  at  08:49 AM
"Janice" slips from anti-Zionosm to anti-Semitism...

The “Israel first” claim is a familiar meme that tars Jewish-American supporters of Israel simply because, unlike any other ethnic group, they can’t be trusted to have dual loyalties like (fill in the blank)-Americans. This is pure sophistry to the point of racism and a blatant attempt to either silence or paint them with the false charge echoing from 1950’s of being “un-American” simply for using their Constitutional rights of speech, assembly and petition. Jewish-Americans in support of a pro-Israel policy are dismissed as Zionist agents or worse, people who can’t possibly be arguing in good faith and thus deserving of unthinking hostility. Perhaps those that feel it necessary to post such slanders need to rethink their position.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Janice
06/26/2010  at  08:13 PM
One afterthought

In an earlier posting to which no one had the desire to respond, I mentioned the fact that my American born brother-in-law who went to Palestine in 1947 as part of the crew of the Exodus became a member of the Palmach where he helped to drive the Arabs of Palestine from his home. He and his American born wife had two children. Those children, my niece and nephew, served in the IDF and later married and had their own children. About 15 years ago they came to a decision that they no longer wanted to live in Israel primarily because of the racism they saw against Arabs but, even more important, because they did not want their children to serve, as they did, as oppressors of the Palestinians.
They now live in California and the only trips they take back to Israel is to visit their ailing mother. When she passes on their trips to Israel will come to an end.
They are sorry that Israel is not the country where they want to live. I am sorry for that too as I would like to admire Israel but I cannot until the occupation ends.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by califlefty
06/27/2010  at  08:53 AM
your comments have nothing to do with the film festival - its a smoke screen

If you had great illusory hopes that Israel would be some sort of ultra-democratic super kibbutz – well too bad, so sad. You’ll have to live with your disappointment and disgust that it turns out Israel is not some utopian beacon for mankind. I find it laughable that there is an expectation from those living outside Israel who seem to be harp on the meme that anything short of perfection must be labeled as utter failure in is some sort of zero-sum game of national building, because “Jews should know better”.  Now the view that Israel and Zionism is vicious is almost universal on the left because of the crumbling of their own adolescent illusions. It’s become a psychosis really, turning on Israel with a rage, a single-mindedness, and a hatred with an enthusiasm not explainable by any actual events.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by proudisraeli
06/29/2010  at  12:25 PM
Poor Janice

Janice ignores many facts—she ignores the facts that the Palestinians demonize Israel/Jews on a continuous basis, in schools , in the press etc.  She naturally blames Israel for their treatment of the Palestinians(BTW, one thread running through all of her posts is that Israel is always to blame).  She then asks whether a jew can marry a non-jew is Israel. The question should be can a Jew live in any muslim country in the Mideast. I think we know the answer to that.
Janice is a anti-Israel propagandist who would be welcome in Hamas circles. I wonder if this Janice is the same Janice who used to runthe festival.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Janice
06/29/2010  at  05:14 PM
I never ran the festival

To pi

No, I have never run the festival.

As for the other Arab countries, lets remember that before the Palestinians were driven out of their lands and homes and not allowed to return, there were many Jews living in Arab countries. Many of them were quite successful in business and lived better lives than do the Arabs of Israel and certainly better lives than do the Palestinians in the occupied territories.

Israel was more than happy to see the Jews leave Arab countries so that they could have more people to fill the lands that they took from the Arabs of Palestine.

Because i criticize Israel does not mean that I let Arab countries off the hook. There are many things that go on in Arab countries that I do not like. But, as my good friend has often told me, because we are Jewish it is our duty to criticize Israel when it says it acts in our name.
Also as an American taxpayer whose taxes make Israel the largest recipient of US aid in the world, aid that goes to build illegal settlements and to perpetuate the occupation, I have a right to speak out.

BTW, there are about 25,000 Jews living in Iran - the country that Israel would love to bomb.

Also read what one Israeli had to say about the emigration of the Jews from Iraq.

THE JEWS OF IRAQ
By Naeim Giladi
“I write this article for the same reason I wrote my book: to tell the American people, and especially American Jews, that Jews from Islamic lands did not emigrate willingly to Israel; that, to force them to leave, Jews killed Jews; and that, to buy time to confiscate ever more Arab lands, Jews on numerous occasions rejected genuine peace initiatives from their Arab neighbors. I write about what the first prime minister of Israel called “cruel Zionism.” I write about it because I was part of it.”

You can finish the rest of the article, if you dare, at http://www.bintjbeil.com/E/occupation/ameu_iraqjews.html

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by proudisraeli
06/30/2010  at  12:07 PM
so who is Janice really

Janice is a major proponent of revisionist history regarding the jewish exodus from arab countries—not that it matters, but she may want to read:

http://www.meforum.org/263/why-jews-fled-the-arab-countries

http://middleeastfacts.com/Articles/history-of-jews-in-arab-countries.php

In addition she states:
“BTW, there are about 25,000 Jews living in Iran - the country that Israel would love to bomb.”

The president of Iran threatens to wipe out Israel, but Janice has no problem with that.

In general, I would take anything that Janice says with a grain of salt—she claims to have been a teenager in 1948—that would make her pushing 80 years. She has plenty of stories about her brother, her brother-in-law, her father etc. None of them having anything good to say about Israel, just postings with venomous attacks on Israel.

Her latest post from Naeim Giladi is false also, besides the fact that he is a notorious anti-zionist, he is not Israeli. He renounced his citizenship decades ago.

the question is, is Janice even Jewish or some anti-Semitic rabblerouser who uses this forum to slam Israel while supporting Palestinian terrorism.

I wonder if Janice is familiar with the recent story of the destruction UN supported day camps for children in Gaza—apparently Hamas was upset since at their daycamps, the children are taught to hate Israel while taking party in military-style activities. At the UN camp they are taught to try to co-exist—Hamas would not have that.
Any comments, Janice? I doubt it.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Janice
06/30/2010  at  09:03 PM
Yes a comment

I think that what was done to the day camps is horrendous and sickening. There is no excuse for it and I would punish anyone involved with the destruction of the day camps. What I have read is that the destruction was carried out by Islamists who did not want boys and girls to mix and who want the kids to spend the day reading the Koran. But there is little I can do about this since my country is not funding these people and is funding Israel, the country that has long oppressed the Palestinians.

As for teaching hatred, there is plenty of that among Israeli kids. My good friends recently went to Israel to visit their children and grandchildren. On a walk with their 7 year old grandson they were horrified when they passed an elderly Arab man and the boy pointed at him and said “all Arabs should be killed.” Where did he learn this?

I am certain that you know that Israeli school kids are not taught to love or even respect those from who they took the land. Why do you expect Palestinian kids to love Israelis when Israel gives them every reason not to?

And, yes, I am not far from 80 and I remember how thrilled I was when the state of Israel was declared. I did not know at the time that the Arabs of Palestine had been pushed out to make room for the Jews of Europe. There was no CNN to show the long lines of refugees carrying their heavy bags or showing Palestinians fleeing into the sea or showing the Palmach,  and Haganah attacking Arab villages. The cameras were not there when the Irgun and the Stern Gang attacked Deir Yassin murdering over 100 men, women and children. That massacre made many Arabs fear that the Jews would do the same to them and so many fled
.
Actually, I probably didn’t even think about it at the time. Life was too full with school and teen age live.

As far as my information I have received most of it from the Israeli press and from Israeli historians. I also have Palestinian friends who were ethnically cleansed from their homes in Palestine but who, unlike me, cannot return.

I see nothing wrong with being anti-Zionist. That does not make one anti-Semitic or “self-hating” any more than being opposed to U.S. policies makes one anti-American or “self-hating” or opposing China’s occupation of Tibet “anti-Chinese.”

Nowhere is it written that because I am Jewish that I have to swear allegiance to Israel. When Israel merits my allegiance by ending the occupation and returning to the 1967 line, they will get my allegiance.

As far as Iran goes, I have read the accurate translation of Ahmadinejad’s speech. What he said was that the Zionist regime would be wiped away. That is like Bush saying that we would wipe away Saddam Hussein. As nuts as is the Iranian leader, he is not that nuts that he would risk losing his country which he would do were he to attack Israel and find his country the recipient of one of Israel’s 200+ thermonuclear bombs. I remember my brother-in-law standing in my kitchen back in the late 1960s telling me that if Israel went they would take the world with them, including the United States. My brother-in-law was an IDF officer and he knew of what he was speaking.
BTW, he never spoke ill of Israel. He only told me what he did and told it pridefully. His kids woke up and have made their home in California. Other than saying that they didn’t like the racism and didn’t want their children to serve as oppressors in the IDF, they said nothing bad about Israel.

Finally the fact that Naim Giladi is no longer an Israeli and that he is an anti-Zionist does not make what he wrote untrue.

Remember pi.  that had the Jews not driven the Palestinians from their homes and lands, the Jews of Arab countries would still be living in their homes. This was a case of tit for tat.

And you must know that in order to have a Jewish state, the Arabs had to be driven out. How else could there have been a Jewish state?

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by spot
07/01/2010  at  01:49 PM
To Janice

Janice,
Keep in mind that Muslims already have 56 states. I wouldn’t call any of them Jew friendly. You are much too arrogant in your postings and it is quite clear that you don’t have a grasp on the historic, religious, moral, and legal ties Jews have to Israel - the only place in the world that Jews can call home. I hope you will take a better look at all that Israel has offered to the Arabs for a peaceful solution, to support the creation of the 57th Muslim state and that has been rejected by the Arabs. Also, were you aware that 900,000 Jews were expelled from Arab lands between 1945-1970? If you are, its time to start mentioning that in all your postings. If not, better go study up.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by proudisraeli
07/02/2010  at  06:24 AM
Poor Janice

Janice keeps on repeating “stories” from her other posts on this forum:

“As for teaching hatred, there is plenty of that among Israeli kids. My good friends recently went to Israel to visit their children and grandchildren. On a walk with their 7 year old grandson they were horrified when they passed an elderly Arab man and the boy pointed at him and said “all Arabs should be killed.” Where did he learn this?”

Interesting how she has a story or incident that puts a bad light on Israel for every horrifying occurrence you point out to her about her buddies in Hamas.

Are these stories of hers true? I have my doubts.
But about that story of hers—yes they are some children that may hear that from their parents, but that is an isolated incident. With Hamas and many of the arab countries—it is government sponsored “education” that teaches hatred of the Jews/isreal.

It is obvious that nothing will stand in the way of Janice spouting her anti-semitic, anti-jewish, anti-zionist diatribes (certainly not the facts).

Look how she now is defending the president of Iran, claiming he does not want to destroy Israel.

Read this, as an example Janice:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/03/AR2006080300629.html

Clearly Janice is not to be taken seriously and while she is entitled to her opinion, it is clear that she is an anti_israel rabble rouser who hated Israel and would like nothing more than to see it destroyed.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by califlefty
07/04/2010  at  09:50 AM
Please keep this thread...

I would like to hear if anyone either at the film festival or supporting organization has raised this issue.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own



Leave a Comment

In order to post a comment, you must first log in.
Are you looking for user registration? Or have you forgotten your password?



Auto-login on future visits