resources
Thursday, June 24, 2010 | return to: news & features, local


Share
 

Protesters slightly delay Israeli ship docking in Oakland

by stacey palevsky, staff writer

Follow j. on   and 

A protest at the Port of Oakland slightly delayed the unloading of an Israeli ship that came into port June 20.

Hundreds of protesters condemning Israel’s recent interception of a Gaza-bound flotilla picketed at the port the day an Israeli Zim Lines ship was expected to arrive at the dock. Demonstrators arrived at 5:30 a.m. with the goal of delaying the Israeli ship for 24 hours.

BAport
Pickets gather at the Port of Oakland on June 20, hoping to disrupt the unloading of an Israeli ship. photo/ap/oakland tribune/d. ross cameron
Protesters expected the ship to arrive in the morning, but it didn’t actually dock until 6 p.m.; crowds stayed all day until 10 p.m., said Marilyn Sandifur, spokesperson for the Port of Oakland.

The Israeli ship was supposed to be unloaded the evening of June 20, but instead was unloaded the following morning, June 21.

The protest also delayed by 24 hours the unloading of a Chinese ship. Workers scheduled to unload the ship that morning were advised not to by their union, the International Longshore and Warehouse Union Local 10. When conditions were deemed unsafe, longshoremen agreed not to cross the picket line.

“In 2003, there was an incident where a bunch of longshoremen were shot trying to get through a picket line at that very terminal, so we stood by on safety,” said Richard Mead, president of the Local 10.

In that situation, an anti-war demonstration at the port turned violent when protesters at the gates of two shipping lines refused to move, and Oakland police opened fire with wooden dowels, concussion grenades and tear gas. At least a dozen demonstrators and nine longshoremen who were standing nearby were injured, according to 2003 news reports.

Israeli Consul General Akiva Tor said he spoke to the Local 10 the morning of the June 20 protest. “They were very clear that they were not participating in the strike against an Israeli ship, but that a situation was created where they were not able to work safely.”

In contrast, Swedish dockworkers this week began a boycott of Israeli ships in protest of Israel’s interception last month of the Gaza-bound flotilla in which nine activists were killed. Eleven Swedish citizens were aboard the flotilla.

The boycott, which began at midnight June 22 and is scheduled to last for one week, covers all of Sweden’s ports. Israel ships fruit, vegetables, spices and skin care products to Sweden. Swedish-Israeli trade accounts for about .2 percent of Sweden’s total imports and exports.

The Oakland incident had some unitended consequences, Sandifur explained.

“Besides unloading imported cargo from a vessel, the Port of Oakland is a premier export seaport,” Sandifur said. “That means that U.S. exports are loaded onto container ships at Oakland for overseas consumers. Therefore, the delay of the China shipping vessel impacted U.S. exports headed to Asia.”

After being unloaded, the Chinese ship departed for international destinations June 21 and the Israeli ship departed June 22.


Comments

Posted by marshall_schwartz
06/24/2010  at  05:57 PM
Incomplete coverage

Gee, thanks for trusting the other side, and not even mentioning that two of us from SF Voice for Israel / Stand With Us turned out for the second gathering of the far-left / pro-Palestinian crowd who showed up at 4 pm.  Of course, how could you get the correct and complete information when you didn’t even have a reporter (or photographer) there?

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by Jeff Blankfort
06/27/2010  at  01:19 PM
Next time, send a reporter

It is rare for me to agree with anyone from SF Voice for Israel/Stand with US, but if J had a reporter at the docks they would have seen close to 800 people picketing at the docks at 5:30 am to prevent the Zim ship from being unloaded. And had they stayed until the late afternoon—not 10 pm, your reporter would have heard Clarence Thomas, President of Local 10, compare the picketing action with that taken against Chile after the overthrow of Allende. Your reporter would also have been aware that the picket had been advertised to their members by the labor councils of both Alameda and San Francisco, both of which had passed resolutions condemning Israel’s attack on the Gaza flotilla, many of whose members, wearing their union shirts or hats, were on the picket line.
But not to worry, there will be many more such pickets and port blockages of Zim ships to cover. And the ship was more than “slightly delayed.” It was originally scheduled to arrive at 2 PM and be on its way by that evening. It didn’t get unloaded and underway until the next day.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by grf
07/09/2010  at  11:10 AM
Correction

Clarence Thomas is not the President of ILWU Local 10. As the article correctly stated Richard Mead is the President of Local 10 and gave no such speech.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own



Leave a Comment

In order to post a comment, you must first log in.
Are you looking for user registration? Or have you forgotten your password?



Auto-login on future visits