Campbell regrets contacts linked to terror groups
by kevin freking, the associated press
| Follow j. on | ![]() |
and | ![]() |
California Senate candidate Tom Campbell said he regrets not conducting more research nearly a decade ago on two men whom he later learned had ties to terrorist groups, but opponents of the Republican are using those contacts to question his support of the Jewish state.
During his 2000 Senate race, Campbell declined to return a contribution from Abdurahman Alamoudi. Speaking to reporters at the California GOP convention on March 12, he said he should have checked more thoroughly into comments Alamoudi made in support of Hamas and Hezbollah. Those comments prompted Hillary Clinton and George W. Bush to return donations from Alamoudi.
Campbell said it was the weekend before the election and nothing had been proven against Alamoudi. He noted, however, that Clinton did investigate the comments and told reporters he should have done the same. “I was in error and I deeply regret it.”
Campbell also said he made a mistake in January 2002 with a letter of support written on behalf of Sami Al-Arian, at the time a professor at the University of South Florida and a political activist with high-level contacts among American politicians. In 2003, Al-Arian was arrested for supporting Palestinian Islamic Jihad. After a lengthy trial in which the jury either acquitted or deadlocked on each charge, Al-Arian avoided a potential retrial by pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to support a terrorist organization. Wiretaps made public in the trial revealed Al-Arian discussing suicide bombings and other terrorist activities.
Campbell, a former congressman who represented San Mateo and Santa Clara counties in Congress, said he wrote the letter out of concern for academic freedom and because Al-Arian had helped with his previous political race. He said he would not have written the letter had he known Al-Arian made the statement “death to Israel.” “I did not know, but I could have known. That was my error,” Campbell said.
The resurgence of interest in Campbell’s past, sparked by Conservative bloggers in February, has a sharply political edge. His connection to Al-Arian and his congressional voting record on Israel, including votes cast against some economic aid packages in the 1990s, are not news; both have been known for years.
On aid to Israel, Campbell argued that “a reasonable disagreement can arise over economic aid without implicating America’s commitment to the defense of Israel against an attack” and said he has always supported military assistance to the Jewish state.
Campbell’s Republican opponents in the June primary, Carly Fiorina and Chuck DeVore, both issued statements condemning Campbell as unreliable and potentially dangerous on Israel issues.
Matthew Brooks, executive director of the Republican Jewish Coalition, says the Al-Arian connection raises a legitimate question. “If he’s offering a mea culpa, then I think that’s a signal to the Jewish community that he maybe would have done things differently,” Brooks said. “It’s up to the voters to decide whether to accept his change of heart or not.”
Idan Ivri of the Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles contributed to this report.
Comments
Leave a Comment
In order to post a comment, you must first log in.
Are you looking for user registration? Or have you forgotten your password?






All
03/24/2010 at 09:22 AM
A while ago, a Republican congressman from San Mateo was running on a platform that was more or less a xerox copy of the Palestinian Covenant. He ran for the GOP nomination to the US Senate. I changed my registration to Republican so I could vote against him in the primary and sent money to whichever other Republican was doing best in the polls. I think it was Pete Wilson.
Pete McCloskey lost the primary to Wilson and then lost his House seat to the late and beloved Tom Lantos. McCloskey’s career became a bygone.
It is time to make Tom Campbell’s career a bygone too.
I greatly enjoyed my stint as a Republican voter and donor and all the fun mailing lists it got me on. Time to do that again. I recommend it to everyone.
Login to reply to this comment or post your own03/24/2010 at 10:27 AM
I too worked against McCloskey, now I am keeping a close eye on Jackie Speier. To date Jackie Speier has been on the wrong side of nearly every Israel-related vote since she became a Congresswoman.
First, when the House voted to condemn the “Goldstone Report” (HR867)she voted “present”. I called her out on that and wrote her and had onversations with some of her staff as well. She then put up this “explanation” on her web-site claiming the reason was that she didn’t like being rushed, so she voted “present” (How much time do you need to know the Goldstone Report was anti-Israel?
Next came the infamous McDermott/Ellison letter which has been slammed by almost every pro-Israel group, she signed it! What was she thinking? I guess she had “plenty of time to consider it”.
Other letters which she has signed that were authored by anti-Israel organizations are: “Capps Letter” which was authored by “Gisha” “Olver letter” (fairly innocuous, but still mostly the anti-Israel bunch)
To be fair Pro-Israel votes by Jackie Speier:
Login to reply to this comment or post your ownHR 34 (Israel’s right to defend itself) and Res 111 – recognizing 61st Anniversary of Israel.
To her credit she did not sign the Moran/Inglis Letter.
So overall, her record is bad! Here is a “scorecard” kept by an anti-Israel web-site on California Congressional delegation, the higher the score, the more pro-Palestinian. Zero is neutral, Speier rates a +2, moderately pro-Palestinian as compared to raging anti-Semites George Miller (+6) and Lynn Woolsey.(+7)