resources
Thursday, November 12, 2009 | return to: views, editorial


Share
 

Food for thought: Slow down before you take that next bite

Follow j. on   and 

Remember the old refrain, “You are what you eat?”

Some in the Jewish community have taken that message to heart, and are pushing to redefine the boundaries of kashrut.

Addressing the Union of Reform Judaism’s biennial this week, its president, Eric Yoffie, pushed the Reform movement’s Green Table/Just Table initiative. The rabbi urged his audience to “think about how the food we eat advances the values we hold as Reform Jews.”

In that regard he proposed that Reform Jews develop more ethical food practices, such as eating less meat, consuming locally grown produce and even eating more slowly.

One need not be an environmental scientist to acknowledge the facts about food production, especially regarding the cattle, poultry and dairy industries: Together those three harm the environment more than the oil and automobile industries combined.

Have you driven down I-5 through the San Joaquin Valley breadbasket lately? On most days, the air is dirtier than L.A.’s.

A few years ago, the United Nation’s Food and Agriculture Organization reported that raising cattle generates more greenhouse gases than driving cars. Factor in the drain on water and land resources in meat production, the resulting mountains of waste and — let’s not forget — that eating too much red meat is harmful to your health, and it’s clear people should reduce their meat consumption.

What makes any of this Jewish? Yoffie says his recommendations are “not about kashrut,” but Jewish activists some time ago launched the eco-kosher movement. Those activists urge sustainable agriculture practices, cruelty-free meat production and healthier eating. Yoffie’s speech suggests these ideas have gained currency.

Some would argue that the rules of kashrut already consider the well being of animals. Moreover, they would say, by invoking holiness in everyday acts such as eating, Judaism already imparts the kind of food consciousness championed by the eco-kosher movement.

We would agree, but do those rules go far enough?

How “kosher” is meat with a hechsher (kosher seal of approval),  if that meat was flown thousands of miles to reach your plate? How “kosher” is it to consume produce picked by migrant workers deprived of basic economic security?

Thoughtful Jews ask these sorts of questions all the time. Does it mean we have to redefine kosher? Not necessarily. But we agree with eco-kosher proponents that to live up to the highest ideals of Judaism, we cannot ignore the impact our food choices have on the wider world.

/u/40482

Comments

Posted by Bacon
11/14/2009  at  03:32 AM
You are what you eat

Not buying kosher meat produced by slave labor under appalling conditions is a way of keeping spiritually if not biblically kosher. The kosher meat business throughout the world is tainted with corruption. Here in the UK, porging has been banned since World War II allegedly because no porging “experts” are available. The real reason, of course, is so that hindquarter meat can be sold very profitably to the non-kosher meat industry. When I lived in California, there was a huge kosher meat scandal involving a kosher meat-packing plant south of L.A. In Israel, there have been discoveries of camel meat being certified kosher. In my view, it is more in the spirit of kashrut to eat organic, non-kosher meat from a reputable source than to eat kosher meat from a tainted source.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by kenkofman944
11/26/2009  at  08:34 AM
Food for Thought editorial

Your otherwise well-written editorial leaves the impression that the foul air along I5 in the Central Valley is solely due to cattle. Please check with the appropriate air resources board, and I believe you will discover that it is non-animal farming that is the overwhleming cause of air pollution in this area.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own
Posted by sivartrm
11/26/2009  at  01:38 PM
KenKofman is correct. I am

KenKofman is correct. I am not an air resources board member but someone who spends a lot of time in the Central and San Joaquin Vallies. The low air quality is due to pollution from the Bay Area going into the Sacto and Central Vallies and being pushed south.
Yes, cows, ranching, and agriculture contribute a fair amount of pollution, but I’m sure your readers would have a NIMBY approach to having those vital businesses in their communities.

Login to reply to this comment or post your own



Leave a Comment

In order to post a comment, you must first log in.
Are you looking for user registration? Or have you forgot your password?



Auto-login on future visits