LONDON — The phenomenon of suicide bombing “is going to be around for a long time,” a British professor predicts in a new paper.
But despite the fact that two Britons were responsible for a suicide bombing last week that killed three Israelis in Tel Aviv, Britain is not likely to produce a wave of suicide bombers, according to Mark Harrison, an economic historian at the University of Warwick.
Harrison is the author of “The Logic of Suicide Terrorism,” which argues that suicide often occurs when a person’s identity becomes more important than his or her life.
Under normal circumstances, such deaths can be seen as heroic or tragic, it says.
“A mother perishes, entering a burning house to save her children, because if she did not she would have to live on without her identity as a loving parent,” Harrison writes. “A witness to a faith accepts a death sentence rather than recant her faith, so valuable to her is her religious identity.”
But in the case of suicide bombing, more sinister forces are at work.
Harrison began studying suicide terrorism after the Sept. 11 attacks.
As he struggled to understand what could motivate such terrorism, he expanded his research to include Palestinian suicide bombings against Israelis.
He identified three critical factors that can lead to suicide bombing: the search for an adult identity; an oppressive environment; and a terrorist faction.
Harrison’s paper argues that the first two factors explain why so many terrorists are reasonably well-educated, unemployed young men: Their circumstances limit the possible identities available to them.
The third factor, a terrorist faction, is then able to shape them into suicide bombers.
The first British suicide bomber to strike Israel blew himself up in Tel Aviv on April 30.
Asif Muhammad Hanif, 21, set off his explosives at a popular beachfront caf, called Mike’s Place, killing three and injuring about 50.
A second British man, Omar Khan Sharif, 27, fled the scene when his own suicide bomb did not explode. Israel is looking for him.
Harrison said British Muslims face particular problems of identity.
“The question of what it means to be a Muslim in a Western society is unresolved. It invites the kind of identity confusion that can make them vulnerable.”
Structuring its thesis in economic terms, Harrison’s paper says an implicit contract is drawn up between the suicide bomber and the terrorist leader.
“Under the terms of the contract, the volunteer agrees to trade life for identity. He will die to promote the faction’s terrorist objectives,” Harrison writes. “In return, the faction agrees to affirm the volunteer’s identity in the community as a warrior martyr, and also provides means of destruction and self-destruction.”